Oh goo grief, I just can't stand what this woman is saying. I'ts hard to stop listening to her because she is so maddening and she obviously has some influence if what some of her interviewers have said is true, that she has two million followers. I suppose she isn't the only purvery or of these things of course, there must be lots of sources for those crazy people out in the streets yelling against perfectly legtiimate actions by the Trump administration. What's scary of course is that this sheer evil could win in the end bujut because of the aggressive volume of their voices. It doesn'[t take many sometimes, just noicse and idsruption.
Anyway, following on from my comments in the previous post I find her saying thta the government is a part of our gross national product. What? What on earth is she talking about? the governmetn? this is so bizarre I don't know what to say, it's just craziness. Then she goes on to say that the tazx cuts by Reagan, and rgulation cuts, that supposedly built up the economy of the country, and yes they dcertainly did as I've said before, doublint ghte tax revenue for starters, but she says that between regan and Biden what "really" happened was that fifty trillion, yes I' msure she said trillion but it's so absurd I'm going to have to check again, any wy anyway, fifty trillion tdolloars supposedly went from the bottom ninety percent of American cictizens to the top ten perscent or something like that. How this happened of course she doesn'[t bother to try to explain such just asserts it althoyughjt it's got to be just about the most crazy thing she's said so far.
Cheked again. Yes she said fifty trillion. Yikes. And says that supposedly all those tax cuts and regulation cuts were supposed to redistribute welath downward but instead reidistributed it upward, and she said to the ONE percent, not to tht ten percent as I had it abov3e. Well, the funny thing is that there is actual IRS information available that saiys clearly that Regan's tax and regulation cuts grew the economy to the extent that the tax revenue doubled in his term in office. that means that more people were working, wages were higher, mjore buinesses were created and all that. That's not exactly "recddicstribution downward" but the right doesn't talk that way, it's growing the general wealth of the whole American economy from which all benefit. No, nothing went from the lwer income brackets to the upper income brackets. And of course she doesn't bother to tggive any evidence anyway, because of course there isn't any. Lefties always think it's enough just to announce something to make it true, and if it seems to their challenged logical ability that if you cut taxes on the rigch it is the rich who will benefit facts don't matter anywayk, , itjust means that therefore the rich benefited. I'll say it again, the evidence is that the whole national economy ebenefited and that means for everybody.
I can hardly believe what she saysx next. She mentions that the different Protestant sects that underlay each of the original thirteen colonies wer often at odds in such as way that Madison in particular wanted to be sure that "mjorality" didn't dictate things in the new federal ctgovernment. I'm always rolling my eyes at what she says and this one is a real eye roller. No, it was specifically the theology of the Protestant sects tht wasn't to dominate the federal goverfnmetn, meaning you couldn't choose one ovder the others. Morality and theology are not the same thing, and in fact we know tht morality exists without religion at all, although of course it can be argued, as george Washing ton did in his final address to the natuion, that morality shold not be separated from religion. Christianityh is founded on a set of morals that he and the other founders regarded as superior and very definitely wanted to see motivating the citizens, and of course the representatives in government as well. QhaR AN ABSOURE DIEA THAT MORALITY WASN'T TO HAVE SUCH A ROLE IN THE GOVERFNMENT. tHERE IS DEFINITELY SOMETHING WRONG WITH hcr'S THINKING. rELGIOUS SECT AS ESTABLSIHED CHURCH OF THE REALM, NO, BUT MORALITY AIS SOMETHING ELSE AND IT DOES not DIFFER FROM SECT TO SECT. tHEOLOTYGY DIFFERERS, BUT NOT MORALITY.
wHEN SHE MAKES SUCH ERRORS AS THESE SHE SHOWS THAT SHE REALLY SHOULDH'T BE IN A POSITION TO GIVE ADVICE TO ANYONE, BUT THE AD THING IS THAT APPARENTLY SHE HAS A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO TAKE ER SERIOUSLYH. vERY SAD.
fORGOT THE POINT i USUALLY LIKE TO MAKE ABOUT THIS, THAT jOHN aDAMS IS FAMOUS FOR SAYING THAT OUR FORM OF CONSTITTUIONAL CGOVERNMENT IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ANY OTHER THAN A MORAL AND RELIGIOUS PEOPLE. bOTH MORAL AND RELIGIOUS. aND HE MEANT cHRISTIAN. aLTHOUGH OTHER RELIGIOUNS ARE NOW INCLUDED IN THE FEREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THERE WAS EVEN SOME CONFUSION ABOUT THTA IN THE DAY OF THE FRAMERS, THE ORIGINAL COLONIES WERE ALL cHRISTIAN, THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE WERE SERIOUS cHRISTIANS, AS TOQUEVILLE NOTED A CENTURY LATER, AND WE SHOULD THINK OF OURSELVES AS A cHRISTIAN NATION. iT IS ONE OF THE REASONS WE ARE ALWAYS ON THE VERGFGE OF ISASTER i AM SURE, THT WE DON'T HOLD TO THAT BASIC PRINCIPLE.
nOT JUST GENERIC BIBLICAL RELIGION BUT cHRISTIANITYH ITSELF WSAS TO BE THE GUIDING PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORK OF THIS NATION. aCCORDING TO cHRLIE kIRK AS i UNDERSTAND IT, EVERY CONSISUTION OF EARVERY ONE OF THE COLONIES REFERRED TO jESUS cHRIST. tO FORM A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WITHOUT THAT BASIC FOUNDING MENTIALITY IS SOME KIND OF CRIME, A BETRAYAL. tHERE ARE ENOUGH REFERENCES IN THE DECLARATION OF iNDEPENDNENCE TO HOLD ONTO TO MAKE THAT CASE, BUT THE FRAMERS THEMSELVES DIDN'T HOLD ONTO IT AS THEY SHOULD HAVE AND OF COURSE TSINCE THEN ANTIChciriSTIAN THINKING HAS TAKEN HOLD. wELL, THIS IS A FALLEN WORLD AND IT ISN'T GOING TO LAST FOREVER. i SUPPOSE WE'LL NEVER BE ABLE TO GET BACK OUR ORIGINAL FOUNDING PHILOSOHY. i JUST HOPE WE DON'T FAIL TO KEEP UP THIS PRESENT RETURN TO BASIC RIGHTEOUSNESS, BECAUSE THE FALL WE WERE HEADED FOR BEFORE TRUMP WON THIS ELECTION WAS PRETTY TERRIFYINGLY TOTALITARIAN UGLY.
fRIA fEBRUARY 14 hAPPY vALENTINE'S DAY AND ALL THAT.
lISTENING ON FROM THE ABOVE. wANT TO TRY TO BE VERY BREIEF ABOUT IT THOUGH. nEEED TO SAY ABOVE THAT mADISON'S OBJECTION TO AN ESTABLISHED RELIGION IN THE GOVERNMENT WAS REALLY A CONCERN TO PROTECT THE cHURCH AND NOT THE GOVERNMENT. wE'VE GOR IT ALL TURNED AROUND NOW, ALONG WITH THE GENERAL MISUNDERSTANDING THAT WE'RE NOT TO HAVE ANY cHRISTIAN REXPRESSIONS WHATEVER IN THE SOECIETY, ESPECIALLY IN CONNNECTION WITH INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. tHIS IS not WHAT THE FRAMERS HAD IN MIND. THE INAUGURATED THE PRACTICE OF OPENING cONGRESS WITH PRAYER AFTER ALL. uNFORTUNATELY NOW THEY OPEN cONTGRESS WITH ALL SORTS OF PRAYERS FROM ALL SORTS OF RELIGIONS THAT GOD CONCDEMENDS. THAT CERTAINLY CAN'T DO THE NATION ANY GOOD. sAME AS HAVING A nATIONAL cATHEDRAL WHERE ANYTHING BUT TRUE cHRISTIAN DOCTRINE IN S PREACHESD.
aNYWAY, hETHER cOX rICHARDSON HAS GONE ON TO TALK ABOUT usaid, THE AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT eLONE mUSK AND HIS TEAM HAVE RECENTLY BEEN EXPOSING AS JAM PACKED WITH FRAUD, WASTE AND CORRUPTION. hcr IS GIVING A VERY SWEET SORT OF PICTURE OF THE AGENCY AS A PURVERYOR OF AID TO FOREIGN NATIONS THAT IS GOOD FOR THAT IS GOOD FOR US AS WELL AS FOR THEM, SUCH AS FOOD FOR HUNGRY CHILDREN AND WATER AND OTHER NECESSITIES WHERE THEY ARE LACKING. nO MENTION WHATEVER OF ALL THE FRAUD THE mUSK TEAM HAS UNCOVERED, TONS OF IT, AND APPARENTLY A LOT MORE TO COME. wHICH DOESN'T MEAN THAT THERE AREN'T SOME GOOD THINGS THE ORGANIZATION DOES, AS THE doge TEAM ITSELF KEEPS POINTING OUT, OR tRUMP DOES ANYWAY. THERE IS NO ACTION TO GET RIDE OF THE GOOD ONES AT ALL. aLL THAT IS SAID IS THAT SINCE THERE ARE SO MANY MORE CORRUPT ONES THAN GOOD ONES THE GOOD ONES WILL PROBABLY BE MOVED TO THE sTATE dEBPARTMENT EVENTUALLY WHERE THEY CAN DCONTINUE TO DO WHATEVER THEY NOW DO. THE doge TEAM WANTS ONLY TO DEAL WITH THE ABUSEE OF TAXPAYER MONEY AND DO AWAY WITH THE PROGRAMS THAT FUNCTION ONLY FOR THAT PURPOSE.
yOU'D THINK THE dEMOCRATS WOULD BE JUST AS PHAPPY AS THE rEPUBLICANS TO ELIMINATE FRAUSD, WASTE AND ABUSE OF TAXPAYER MONEY, SO THEIR OUTRAGE IS HARD TO EXPLAIN AS ANYTHING OTHER THAN BENEFITTING FROM THE FRAUD, WSTE AND CORRUPTION. iF NOT, WHAT IS IT?
sHE ALSO KEEPS TALKING ABOUT eISENHOWER IN RELTAION TO usaid, BUT HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. iT WAS jOYHN f. kENNEDY THAT ESTABLISHJED IT BY AN EXECUTIVE ORDER AS i'VE HEARD FROM MORE THAN ONE SOURCE. iT'S PART OF THE eXECIUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT BY THE WAY, WHICH DOEN'ST GET INTO THIS CONVERSTAION MUCH, BUT THAT GIVENES IT , OR THAT MAKES IT A LEGITIMATE TARGET FOR tRUMP AS TODAY'S eXECUTIVE bRANCH. iT DOESN'[T HAVE TO GO THROUGH cONGRESS TO BE MADE A LEGITIMATE TARGET OF SUCH AN INVETIGATION AS SOME KEEP SAYING BECAUSE IT WASN'T CREATED BY cONGRESS.tHE EXECUTIVE GRANCH IS WELL WITHIN ITS RIGHTS TO CLEAN UP ITS OWN ACT IN OTHER WORDS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE FROM THE OTHER BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.
hcr'S THINKING IS SO WEIRDLY WRONG i KEEP NOT WANTING TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT AT ALL, BUT THEN i GET ANGRY ABOUT HER HAVING SO MUCH INFLUENCE WITH SO MUCH WEIRDLY FALSE INFORMATION. sHE SAYS THT WHAT doge IS DOING IS JUST . WELL SHE IMPLIES THEY HAVE NO GROUNDS FOR SAYING , HOW DOES SHE PUT IT, THAT usaid IS JUST FOR PEOPLE ON THE TAKE OR WHATEVER. oN THE TAKE. iS THAT HOW SHE PUT IT. wELL i'LL CORRECT IT IF i FIND OUT i'M WRONG BUT i THINK THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID. iT SEEMS TO BE HER WAY OF REDUING THE DISCOVERY OF ENORMOUS DEPTHS OF WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO A CATCHPHRASE OF HER OEWN FOR OSME REASON THAT DOESN'T EXPRESS WHAT THEY'VE ACTUALLY BEEN SAYING. THEY'VE ACTUALLY found THIS FRAUD, THEY HAVE ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF THIS FRAUD, THEY ARE DOCUMENTING IT, THEY CAN TRACK IT. tHIS TEAM IS GOOD AT WHAT THEY ARE DOING. THIS IS NOT SOME MADE UP WILD ACCUSATION AS SHE KPEEPS IMPLYING, THIS IS REAL CORRUPTION THEY ARE FINDING. bUT SHE SAYS IT'[S ALL JUST AN EXPRESSION OF THIS STORY SHE SAYS IS HELD BY SOME THAT TH GOVERNMENT IS BAD. hOW'S THAT FOR A NICE LITTLE PIECE OF TRIVILIAZLIZATION. THE GOVERNME,TN IS BAD. jUST A STORY THAT REALLY MEANS NOTHING ACCORDING TO HER. GOLLY GOSH. tHE WHOLE CONSERVATIVE FOCUS ON THE DANGERS OF bbIG gOVERNMENT WHICH IS A PRINCIPLE TRACEABLE TO THE cONSSITUTION IS REDUCED BY HER TO THIS ODD LITTLE PHRASE tHE GOVERNMENT IS BAD. nOT EVEN gOVERNMENT ITSELF IS BAD, JUST THAT THIS GOVERNMENT IS BAD IS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE. THERE'S SOMETHING SO WACKO ABOUT WHAT ISHE IS SAYING IT'S HARD TO FOLOWOW. i WISH MY TYPING WEREN'T SO BAD.
i'VE ALREAYDCOMENTED ON SOME OF THE THINGS SHE SAYS NEXT AND THIS POST IS GETTING AWFULLY LONG SO i'LL STO P FOR NOW, BUT ALTHOUGH SHE SEEMS TO BE SAYING SOME REAOSNABLE THINGS ABOUT THE cONSTITUTION IN WHAT FOLOWS SHE ALWAYS SAYS ENOUGH WACKO STUFF TO MAKE ME WANT TO SAY MORE EVENTUALLY. i DON'T KNOW BUT i'M GOING TO STOP HERE FOR NOW.
Politics Chat: February 7, 2025 - YouTube
\\jUST LISTENED TO THE END AGAIN. iS SHE REALLY SAYING THERE ARE A LOT OF aMERICAN CITIZENS WHO ARE IN FAVOR OF SENDING MILLIONS, EVEN BILLIONS OF us TAXPAYER'S MONEY TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO PROMOTE TRANSGENDER PROPAGANDA OR SUPPORT TRANSGENDER MUTILATION SURGERY WHEN WE'VE GOT PEOPLE HERE WHO STILL CAN'T ET fema TO TAKE CARE OF RHTIE LOSSES FROM hURRICAN E hELEN AND OTHER DOMESTIC SUFFERINGS THAT ARE GOING BEGGING?
wHILE fema SPENDS MILLIONS TO HOUSE ILLEGAL IMIGRANTS IN POSH HOTELS AND FEED THEM POSH FOOD ALTHOUGH SOME OF THEM HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST aMERICANS, WHILE THE PEOPLE fema WAS CREATED TO HELTP ARE GOING BEGGING??
yES SHE HASN'T MENTIONED fema, IT JUST SEEMS TO ME TO BE ALL OF A PIECE WITH SPENDING MONEY ON GTRANSGENDER PROPAGANDA IN WHO KNOWS WHERE AND SHE SAYS WE ARE CALLING FRAUD WHAT SHE THINGS ARE LEGITIMATE EXPENSES FO RTHE GOOD OF THE NATION AND THIS IS THE SORT OF THINGSGG THAT IS BEING TREATED AS FRAUD SO SHE MUST THINKI IT'S ALL JUST FINE AND DANDY AND SHOULDN'T BE CUT.
No comments:
Post a Comment