Was finally able to listen to the last two messages with the Read Aloud function and found out that a lot of the earlier message is gobbledygook, apparently the result of my fingers slipping off their proper orientation on the keyboard. There's no way I can reproduce what I said there, I don't really remember it, but I think I can maybe say some more that may be related to it.
I was very impressed that it has ALWAYS been Rome that is the main persecutor of the saints of God, at least since the time of Jesus and down through the last two millennia of the Christian era. The Caesars, the Christians hiding in the catacombs, the hints at it in the New Testament writings and the known history we have of all that.
And then when the Roman Empire fell the Roman Church rose in its place and the Pope beame the new Caesar as it were. Presiding over Western Christendom for about a milennium, and known for perseucting the true XChristiansz. The Waldenisains and the Hugeuenots and others down through the benturies, adding up to something like fifty million Christians martyred accordihng to one source, David Plaisted. Others were also murdered by the Roman Church,, such as Jews and muslims, but according to Plaisted that number was about seventeen million whle the Christians are arer and away the greatest number of artyre.
How do we not know that these days? When did the Church stop rading history? When did they stop reading books like Dowling's History of Romanism and Wylie's History of Protestantism. Don't we still read Foxes' Book of Martyrs" Has that lesson been missed somehow too?
Yes Rome Rome Rome. Rome in the early years and Rome in the Middle Ages, and it still goes on now in Roman Catholic Countries away from the public eye as I've noted on my Catholicism blog. Tehy've never recanted thri anathemas against the Protestants which are enshrined in their Council of Trent. Whenever they have the power we can be sure they'll be going after the saints again, and those must be the saints of the book of Revelation and their persecutor must be the Roman Church.
Which IS what the Harlot image is in Revelation seventeen. Mystery Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots. That's Rome Rome Rome. Just consider the statue of Nebuchadnezzar's drea m from the book of Daniel. ONE image of ONE man made up of four empires with Babylon as its head and Rome as it's feet. Rome is Babylon. And the animsls of Daniel's own dreams and visions. The fourth beast It's hard to think of there being any other Antichrist yet to come than the Pope. H'es been recognized for centuries bydissident Christians as the Antichrist, why would he stop being the Antichrist now?:
Besides which, the nu mbmer 666 most perfectly fits the title of the Pope, Vicarivs Filieii Dei. Sorry I think I got that wrong. Trye again. VICARIVS FILII DEI. It means Substitute for the Son of God which is practically a defintiion of Antichrist itself, but then the Roman Numberal s which are embedded in the title add up to 666. If I managed to get it written correctly. But I've written it selsewhere on the blog so it can be checked.
Why has the Chuirch been so misled? They don't even know that Westcott and Hort were Catholic sympathizers and "hated" the King Ja mes Bible. Hated it? So they gave us Bibles of lousy translations based on lousy and heretical manscripts byat may be forgeries. QWhat happened to the Church? What sort of blindness has overtaken us? Are we reaping the consequences of the liberis.loism of the nineteenth century? Is this judgment on the Yes and don't forget
Yes and don't forget the cCatholic connections with Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot and Rwanda. Hitler even said he modeled his Holocaust on the Roman Inquisition. The masascre in Rwanda was instigated by a Catholic Bishop over the radio.
ROME ROME ROME. WSHouse of God?
