So according to creationists Junk DNA so called is really not junk, they've discovered that it has regulatory functions, turning genes on and off. I've found that idea to be pretty puzzling. It takes ninety eight perecent of the enome to regulate two percent of it? Does not compute. Am I missing something.?
Before I started jearhearing about this idea that jhunk DNA isn't really junk I'd been accepting the idea without question and in fact finding it to be very compatible with creatinism. Seems to me that all that dead DNA reflects the FAall, and [erpahaps the Flood. It represents capacities the human being, and all animals foer that matter that also have a lot of noncoding DNA, once had many capacities and strengths we no longer posses since we've become vulneratlbe to all kinds of injuries, idseases and so on since the Fall. I think of mutations as a major agent of the Fall, attcking healthy DNA and over time destroying it, being the main creators of junk DNA.
So I see Junk DNA as most likely really junk, destroyed genes from a far stronger and in fact truly amazingly capalbe creature that no longer exists because of si. Amazine how well we manage to functino on just two perecent of what we once possessed.
That's how I think of it. You can laugh now.
