j
jAN RAISES THE QUESTION AT ONE POINT wHY WOULD THESE GLOBAL MOVERS AND SHAKERS BE WILLING TO SUBJIT TO THE aNTICHRIST, UNDERSTANDING OF COURSE THAT ALL THIS IS LEADING UP TO THE AGENDA SPELLED OUT IN THE bOOK OF rEVELATION KNOWN AS THE gREAT tRIBULATION, THE REIGN OF THE aNTICHRST AND ALL THAT , THE gREAT rESET BEING UNDERSTOOD AS THE FORMAT FOR THE WHOLE SHEBANG. tHE QUEi
sINCE i KEEP ARGUING FOR THE pOPE AS THE aNTICHRIST i DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE QUESTION wHY WOULD THEY SUBMIT TO HIM. mOST IF NOT ALL OF THEM ARE cATHOLICS, THEY ALREADY REGARD THEMSELVES AS SUBSERVIENT TO THE pOPE. hE SIMPLY HASN'T YET EMERGED AS THE FINAL WORLD LEADER. cHRIS pINTO IDENTIFIED IN ONE OF HIS SHOWS A WHILE BACK HOW MANY OF THEM ARE cATHOLICS, INCLUDING gATES AND fAUCI. cERTAINLY bIDEN IS AND tRUDEAU AND mACRON, BUT ALSO sCHWAB HIMSELF. pRINCE cHARLES ISN'T AND HE MAY BE THE ONLY ONE, BUT HE'S INTO iSLAM AND DOESN'T IDENTIFY WITH THE TRADITIONAL cHURCH OF eNGLAND ANYWAY. oNCE THE pOPE IS RECOGNIZED AS THE aNTICHRIST THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY PROBLEM ANSWERING THAT QUESTION, BUT OF COURSE MOST END TIMES PROPHECY DISCUSSIONS CONTINUE TO REGARD THE FINAL aNTICHRIST AS YET A MYSTERY TO BE REVEALED JUST BEFORE HE TAKES POWER. i CAN'T ACCESS cHRIS pINTO'S SITE ANY MORE EITHER SO i DON'T KNOW WHAT HE'S BEEN SAYING ABOUT ALL THIS BUT i'M SURE HE'S NOT IGNORING THE cATHOLIC AGENDA WHICH HE'S ALWAYS BEEN THE STRONGEST VOICE.
i OUT THAT hITLER'S THIRD rEIGCH MEANT THE THIRD rOMAN eMPIRE. tHAT NEVER GETS ACKNOWLEDGED ANYWHERE THAT i KNOW OF. tHERE WAS rOME, THERE WAS THE REVIVED rOME IN THE hOLY rOMAN eMPIRE LED BY THE pOPE TO WHOM KINGS HAD TO BOW, THEN THERE WAS THE tHIRD rEIGCH THAT DIDN'T FULLY GET OFF THE GROUND, FORTUNATELY, AND NOW WHAT sCHWAB WANTS TO DO IS INAUGUATE THE fOURTH rEIGN CH OR THE fOURTH rOMAN eMPIRE. hEY IT ALL FITS TOGETHER IF YOU JUST TAKE THE BLINDERS OFF AND REOGNIZE THAT THE rOMAN cATHOLIC cHURCH IS bABYLON THE gREAT THE wHORE OF rEVELATION 17, THE HEIR OF THE RELIGION OF nIMROD. MIGHT ALSO POINT
cORRECTION: sORRY, NOT prince cHARLES, HE'S NOW king cHARLES.
aND i SHOULD PROBABLY MENTION THAT THERE ARE AN AWFUL LOT OF cATHOLICS IN OUR aMERICAN GOVERNMENT NOW TOO. a FEW YEARS AGO pELOSI AND bAYNOR, MISPELLED IT i'M SURE, HAD THE pOPE VISIT cONGRESS, A HORRIFIC AFFRONT TO OUR pROTESTANT BEGINNINGS. yES, pROTESTANT. wHAT WAS THE MAIN TYRANNY THE FIRST aMERICANS FLED FROM ANYWYA? rELIGIOUSX TYRANNY, AND WHAT WAS THE GLARINGLY PREDOMINANT TYRANNY IN eUROPE BUT THE rOMAN cATHOLIC cHURCH FOR ALMOST A THOUSAND YEARS. tHEN THE aNGLICANS TOOK ON SOME OF THE DISEASE BUT THE aNTICHRIST RELIGION OFTHE pOPE WAS ITS INSPIRATION, AND THAT CAME FROM PAGAN rOME OF THE cAESARS. aMERICAN cATHOLICS SEEM TO BE A DIFFERENT KIND OF cATHOLIC FOM THOSE IN eUROPE. tHEY SOUNDS A LOT MORE LIKE pROTESTANTS. bUT IF THEY STILL ACKNOLEDGE THE pOPE AS THE hEAD OF THE cHURCH WHICH USURPS THE ROLE OF cHRIST, IT MIGHT NOT TAKE MUCH TO THROW US TO THE gREAT rESET WHEN THE TIME COMES. wHICH IS NOT VERY FAR OFF AS THINGS APPEAR ALREADY.