At the end of his talk David Montgomery says he thinks we should all be focused on the many problems of the earth itself, such as problems with water, air, soil, atmosphere, etc. I agree. He also thinks "religion" or "religions" need to deal with our conflicts with science. Well, it's got nothing to do with religions in the plural because the only true religion is Christianity and the only dealing I think we need to do is to be very clear about the fact that the Bible is not to be contradicted, that even if we can't reconcile it with what science thinks it knows, it is always science that is wrong and we should never give in to it.
However, I think we know enough now to say that the Flood is definitely the explanation for all kinds of things science has attributed to their ridiculous Old Earth and Evolution. I think my own two very simple arguments alonblow tall that to smithereens. And when I say they are MY arguments I'm aware that God has guided me to them so they are His arguments.
,
The problems Montgomery mentions need the Flood perspective to deal with them but the problem is the fallen mind. They like their Old Earth and Evolution too much and are determined to punish us all for their erroneous views, or at least the political part of the world has that in mind. But if we started thinking in terms of the Flood we'd have a much better chance of coming up with truly rational ways of approaching these problems.
.
For instance, I rthink the ice age was the result of the Flood and that any global warming we are now seeing is just the result of the retreat of the icea age which was inevitable.
The Flood explanation of course means the God of the Bible must be recogniz3ed. For some time we were a Chridstian culture but now we're so far from it how likely is it we could revive it? Well, maybe if the fact, yes fact, that evolution is a big fat fraud got re cocognirzed we could have that revival.
No comments:
Post a Comment