Is Part of the Globalist Agenda to Target the Unvaccinated?

I haven't been following much of the current news these days, just bits here and there, enough to notice that COVID is still being kept alive for some reason, the propaganda against the unvaxxed continues though in more muted terms than earlier, the censorship of anyone who dissents from the prevailing policies against COVID continues, althoughit's certainly nice to see what Elon Musk is trying to do with Twittter and I hope he succeeds in restoring frree speech for the dissident side.   The globalist agenda is still on the minds of some on the dissident side, notably in the Christian arena where it fits so well into the end times scenario of th coming Great Tribulation.  

But what as been preoccupying me lately is some rumblings I'm hearing about the targeting of groups such as the unvaxxed, targeting in the sense of intimidation, harassment, vague threateings and evensometimes rather pointed threatenings.  This is all under the radar of the main sources of news and commentary I hear, and I'm still not hearing a lot these days so tht mayh not mean much.

Although I determined some time ago that I wouldn't listen any more to the late night sppok show as I think of it, Coast to Coast radio with George Noori, I happened to hear one of his guests talking on the subject of AI as a weapon in the hands of "aliens" to eliminate the human race, so I listened to most of it.   It's frustrating to me that anyone ebelieves at all in real phyiscal aliens as in extraterrestrials becuase their behavior is simply impossible in the phyiscal world.  Their "spacecraft" operate at physicaly impossigble speeds, change directsions at such speeds any physical ehicle would simply disintergrate and any living things perish in the maneuever.  Yet some actually seem to think this could be simple very advanced technology.  Tehy can't think outside the phyiscla context.  That's why I was so captiated by the UFOlogist Jacques Vallee who analyzed the UFO phenomena as spiritual beings.  He's not a CHristian, he isn't talking about demons, but just the fact that he sees their behavior in terms that defy phyiscal explanations and imply something spiritual he opens the dor to the Christian view that all such phenomena are really demonic, fallen angels with an agenda of their own that is malevolent , at the very least determined to deceive us and mislead us, underminje the Christian salvation offer, lead us all Hell if they can, and perhaps manipulate things on Planet Earth to some end of their own.   

But anyway tthis guest of George Noori was one Cyrus Parsa or something like that, and he does believe in real aliens and things their agenda is to destroy the human race and replace us with some kind of AI hybrid or something like that, pehraps a hybride of alien and human, I'm not sure I got what he really has in mind.   He also claims to have psychic or clairvoyant powers and to have predicted the pandemic.  I'd like to see his films or read his books but I haven'[t been able to find the films yet and I can't read any more. so...

I can't usually follow discussions of sophisticaled technology so I tune them out but lately I'm hearing about the possibility of technology on an extraordinarily advanced level being used to control intimidate harass or even kill human beings.  Of course the tchology of vaccines designed to destroy us rather than protect us is a hint in that difrections but it gets a lot spookier than that and I don't know how to judge any of this, I don't know what's possible techologically and what isn't.  Are very small drones that could be lethal or even deliver vaccinations against a person's will possible?  Are even tinier drones possible, REALLYsmall techno pmarvels that could harm people, perhaps get inside their bodies and hardm their organs and bringsaobut a slow death?  It siounds impossible to me but then I really have no clear idea about what's possible in the physical tech world at all.  I'm likely to think demons whern I hear anyhthing about such possibilities because I KNOW that demons are real, that they are malevolent and that they can hurt people unless those people are protected by Jesus Christ.

\I saw a film about "targeted individuals" in the UK and that's the title of the films.  They sound psychotic and they may be but then perhaps it's possible that they'[ve been subjected to some kind of high tech manipulations that are at least designed to make them into experiments for say some global power.  We know the global powers aare in operation and working up[ to some kijd of power grab sp tjat  so tthat part of it is crebdible at least to me.  But behond that are these things physical possible or are they all the inventions of hyperactive insecure people?

Ju[eratctove omagomatopms/

I'd like to be able to find out something about the possibilities involved.  I'd like to be able to find a source of information I coudl follow, about how sophisticated technology could possibly be used to target a vulenerable group of people who are refusing to goalong with the globalist agenda, say those who refused the COVID vaccines.  If such technologisy exists there must be some people somehweere who know about it, maybe even people who know it is already in use aginjsinst such groups.  

I've already been amazed at how much power those on the globalist side seem to have already, the power in particular to silence us dissicddents, anyhone who dissents from their agenda concerning COVID for starters.  I'm one though I don't feel threatened in such a personal way...yet.  I am persuaded that as manyh as ninety percent of those who have died of  CO ID would have survived if it hadn't been for the suppression of information about therapeutics such as hydroxychloroquine with ince, or ivermectin or even such the immune boosint effects of largedodoses of vitamins D and C aong other nutritional supplements.  I see a corrupt and vidious vicious propagansda campaign against such helpful thijgs while promoting the vaccines wihich are not vaccines, which don't prevent the virus or its transmission and have known adverse effects on a very large percentage of people compared to the usual permissible percentage which is very tiny and would oridinarily cause such a so called vaccine to be pulled from public use.   This is diaboligical manipulation of the public and it's very scary.  I wouldn't have thought it possible but it's been happening for such.  Along with the amazinglyh successful censorship of all the voices who are raised in protest of this corrupt and diaboligical agenda.  How many of the public actually get to hear such voices?  They are slandered to such an extent that many just accept that they must be charlatans who are passing along misinformation instead of the highly credential edmedical people most of the them are.  It's amazine how well this censorship and propaganda campagin has succeedded in keeping  so much of the pulic in the dark and inocjulated against the truth and marginalizing those who do know the truth.  

Anyway, I hear of individuals being targeted by intimidating tacts, even threats against their health and their lives through this sophisticaled technologist and I don't know how to find out more about it.  

Below I've copied out the link to the video about the targeted people in the UK, a few years beofre COVID so it's now about the vaccines though it could be the model for something along those lines now.  Unless of course the people simply are psychotic.  If I didn't know wsoso much about the malevolent propaganda that is clearly going on I might just dismiss them too, but in today's atmosphere I don't put it past those malevolent forces to target individuals as experiments or for whatever other purpose that fits their agenda.

I alsmot hav linkedto today's Jan Markell radio show becuase it's about the Great Reset.

 Meet the Targeted Individual Community; Target Non V'd - YouTube

The End-Game: Hiding in Plain Sight – Pastor Jack Hibbs and Charlie Kirk - YouTube

And here's a link to Chris Pito's site.  I haven't been able to listen to him lately because it's been hard to find his website.  I mjjust found it so I'm putting up the link:

NOTR - THE ANNUAL CHRISTMAS SHOW - 12.26.2022 - Show Downloads - Noise of Thunder Radio with Chris Pinto

s3.media.squarespace.com/production/827989/9727427/CHINA.UKRAINE.KANYE_12.8.2022.mp3?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIGASFZJDTI4L3CAA&Signature=0UGkoYdS%2Fa4TbZsHHVdQ01GamRY%3D&Expires=1672441196

Star of Bethlehem

 Happened on a teaching by John MacArtghur in which he covers the star that led the Magi to the child Jesus.  He speculates about carious aspects of the storiy in interesting ways but as he talked I realizeds his view of for instance the star itself was unconficing, and was reminded of the study by Rick Larsen called The Betlehem Star in which he uses an astronomy computer program to track down the star that scripture says appeared at the birth of Jesus.   I had to watch that video many times but eventually found it very convincing, and John MacArthur needs to see it.

MacArthur identifies the death of Herod, which is a key factor in olocating the time of Jesus' birth as 54 Ad.  I hope I wrote 4,  Fiyur Fiyr, AD,   Tujes U cab;t seen ti cibtrik nt fubdgers abt nire eutger,  Abtwatm ibe tgubg larsen did in his study was discover evidence that the four AD time for Herod's death was wrong although it's been preserved in all the recent publications of Josephus, which is the source of it.  Earlier references give ONE AD as the year of Herod's birth, and that makes a big difference in the attempt to discover the star.  Kepler had been hampered by the wrong date in Josephus, but with the evidence Larsen discovered he is able to come to a very convincing date for Jesus' birth and the explanation of tghe star that marked it.

Searching the sky with his astronomy software in the year Three BC, Larsen discovered a tribple conjuinction of Jupiter with the planet Regulus, King Planet conjunct King Star, occurring in the constellation Leo.  Herald of the birth of a great King?  Leo represents the Lion of Judah.  But right behind Leo rising in the sky is the constellation Virgo, which Larson recognizes as exactly fitting the description given in the Book of Revelation Chapter Twelve, the woman clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet.   He speculates that this could be the conception date of Jesus and I think he's right.  It's Rosh Hashanah of Three BC.  

Nine months later is where the brightest celestial object anyone had ever seen, according to Larson, appeared in the sky.  June of Two BC.  Surely the time of Jesus' birth.

I'm convinced but you have to see it yourself and follow out his argument.

Then he brings the Magi into the picture, who would have seen that star and started their journey when they saw it.  As Larson puts the timing together he has them arriving at Bethlehem in two BC on... December 25th.   Yes, do watch the viceo and follow the argument.  I think it's very compelling.  It wasn't the birth of Jesus, which nobody thinks anyway since shepehereds don't watch their flocks on hillsides at night in winter, but the visit of the Magi, which is a sort of type of tghe giftgivers at Christmas now?  Why not?

And vfrom there Larson oes on to put it all together as what he calls a "celestial poem" leading up to the crucifixion, which he shows on his software was crowned by a blood moon and followed by the constellation Virgo with a FULL BLOOD MOON at her feet.   Yep, you need to see this video.

His website is Bethlehem Star.com.  Bethlehem Star.com.  can't control my fingers either these days.

It used to be at You Tube but ow there are so many things that come up under that title I'm snot sure which one is his if any of them are.

Don’t Dance With the Devil – Pa

stor Mark HJohn MacArthur: Becoming a Better You? - YouTubeenry, Pastor Jason Carlson, and Jill Martin Rische - YouTube

John MacArthurr on Galatians: "The Battle Cry of the Protest Reformation"

Getting the Gospel Right - YouTube

 Freedom in Christ, Part 1 - YouTube

aNOTHER bLEAT aGAINST THE nasb

John MacArthur on the Reality of Hell

J W Burtgon Could Have Saved the Church From the Bogus Bibles

Oh Oh please please please please please please.   At a Ligonier conference John MacAethur mentioned that Mark 16 "is not in the Bible."  this is SO upsetting, and yes I know I've said this so many times if anybody did read my blog it would be so annoying they wouldn't read muc more of it.  

Who said it's not in the Bible?  Westcott and Hort.  Westcott and Hort.  All sorts of thingsx that for centuries were known as Bible truth were declared by W and H not to be in the Bible   Because their preferred Greed manuscr9ipts, known as the "earliest" we have, don't include them.  It was their manuscripts that became the bedrock of the modern translations while the King James was treated as a poor translation from a bad set of Gree Manscripts.  On their sayso.   The fact that their 
earliest" manscripts are extant today, in nearly peperfect condition after nearly two millennia, doesn't seem to raise any doubts in anyone's minds.  They are dated back to the fourth century and there they are in all their pristine glory and it's just accepted that the tradition on which the King James ghad been based is the wrong one and this earlier stuff the true one.  Well, golly gosh, it IS earlier, right?  Isn't that all you need to know?

Bamboozled by the :scholars"   Mac Arthur, R C Sproul, Martyn Lloyd Jones.  all these and many others of the best of the best have accepted thje work of Westcoot t and Hort of the revising committie that produced its new bogus Bible in 1881.  I've heard all of these speak of passages that are not really in the Bible although they are included for tradition's sake in most of the newer translations.  they've bought the lie foisted on the Church by the Westcott and Hort dominated revosomg cp,,ottee/  

Unfortunately the main opponents, or the best known, the King James Only people, have credibility pro0blems of their own, so when James White did his book against them it had a lot of authoritative clout.   But although they are maybe the biggest group of opponents to the new fersions, and I'm not even sure of that any more but they certainly were a couple of decades ago, ... lost track of what I qas sayhing and insce I ca n't see what I'm writing I have to leave it there.  Sorry

I don't condser myself to be KJV Only althoughn I end up on their side from a different angle.   I read enough of DSean John Willion Burgon's books to be his staunch supporter and I  consider him to t bbe the one who should be taught in tbhe seminaries, not Westcott and Hort.  Burtgon is very convincing that W and H were not only Crypto Catholics who hated the King James Bible for reasons of their own, but deficient scholars to the point of operating at what he called "schoolboy" level/.  He wrote a lengthy book on Mark 16that I wish MacArthur had read, and he wrotge The REVISION revised which takes apart the Greek manuscripts they smuggled into their revision as well as their bad translation which Burgon says mangle the English on top of giving us a bogus Greek man uscript.

Burgon identified the Gree,k manuscripts preferrs by W and H as the word of early heretics.  they took out some of the most famous passages that had come down to us as the "textus Receptus which underlies the King James, and W and H made up the explanation that this was because scribes must have added in those passages along the way wince obviously to their mind these supposedly earliest manuscripts were the authentic ones and they couldn't be at fault.  Except that Burgon says they are at fault, and that is in fact why they are in such pristine condition.  the textus Recepturs exists only in fragments back to the tenth century because it was USED, while the W and H manuscripts are in such condition because they were never used.  

Anyway in my opoinion Buregon is the authority we should be trusting.  

Somehow or other MacArthur and others who accept this bamboozle nevertheless don't let it affect their belief in the Bible's inerrancy.  I'm  not sure how they manage this but somehow they do.  If pasages were added in later how can we accept them and how can we believe the Bible is inerrant if the original authorts cid not include them.  ???  

QWho am I to say anything at all?  I'm no scholar.  I just happen to think burgon makes the best case and what I've read about Westcott and Hort show them to be supre,e;lu iuntrustworthy.  For on e thing they did not even stick to the instructions given them for the revising committee.  Bringing in a new set of Greek manscripturs was a sneaky act of their own that was not warranted by the defined task of the committee, which was only tu up[date the King James Bible.

Burgon criticized W and H for their translation of the Greek word "aeion" as "age" and he argues that at some langth.  But their translation has stuck and people take it as an apt criticizm of tyndale's "wold" as opposed to "age."  He also criticized their ustranslation of a Greek tense which I think is called the Aorist?   aorist tense, which they translated with the awkward and unnglish phrases ending in "indg" supposedly because English doesn't sufficiently get across the ongoing nature of many of the Greek phrases which are more clearly expressed in the Greek.  As Burgon says this is ludi crous, and it reads badly in mty opinion.  I cringe everytime someone quotes such a phrasef from the NASB.  It's bad English.  The Eordinarly English past tense is just fine for conve nyhint gwhat needs to be conventy in most of those cases where they have mangled it with their schoolboy understanidng.  Where something more emphastic is required to get across the ongoing meaning of a pphrase the King James uses the "ing" form but for the bast manjroity of places wehre the Greek uszes the aorist tense it is not needs ed in the English.  Burgon knows what he is talking about.  i wish he were the authority the seniminaries use.

But whole generations of seminary students are now bamboozled about the Greek language, and ofcourse they aren't in any position to know any better. Idf MacArthur and Sproul and >Llloyd Jones don't knjow any better then the poor student new to Greek doeshnj'[t stand a chance.

Chris Pinto has covered a lot of territory on the subject of the bogus Greek Manuscripts used by Westcott and Hort in his filom series on the history of the Bible.  tares among the Wheat is one of them where it comes up but I think Bridge to Bablyon is where he gets more deeply into it.

Mark 16 belongs in the bible.  It wqas wsritten by Mark.  

I suppose it must be because the Church is under God's judgment that we are now subjected to this kind of insanity that undermines our Bibles.

----------------------------------------

Mea

Meant to poihnt out that in one of the supposedly earliest manuscripts so revered by W and H, the Siniaticus I think, there is a big gap in the text where tMark 16 appears in the tradition that undelies the King James.  Certainly d\suggests thatcontrary to the theories of Q and H that passage had been there before and was left out of this version.

Also want to add that I just heard R XC  Spro7ul  call the King James Bible "a bad translation" because of how it used the word "evil" instead of "calamity""y.  But isn't it just that the word had more of that connotation when the translation was done?  Why call it a bad translation?  that's part of the legacy of Westcott and Hort.  Distressing to me but then who am I ?  Most Christians have accepted the W and H frame of reference.  the fact that the King James Bible had a very high place in english speaking cultrue for centuries no longer carries any weight.  We now accept inferior translations of possibly heretical or even forged Gre4ek manuscraupts