What's the Real Cause of the Rise of Vvariants, and the Continuing and Increasing COVID Cases and Deaths?

Just heard on radio news. Although the programming is conservtive, the news comes from the "mainstream" liars. I haven't figured out how that happens but it's only a couple minutes of lies and I suppose it's good to know what half the country is believing.

What I just heard is that COVID cases among children, actually Delta variate cases I think they said, are up by 37% SINCE LAST WEEK. I don't know about you but that hit me as rather suspect. But then I'm so cynical these days you should probably have some caution about my eactions. And what was m6y reaction? Golly Gosh, didn't they just do a blitz campaign to get children vaccinated? Golly Gosh, would you be surprised to discover that this increase in cases is in children who were vaccinated? I woujldn't, but then again I'm so cynical take it with a spponful of salt....

They've been manipulating the COVID statistics from the betginning so when they say there are all these cases of UNJvaccinated people sick with COVID, I simply do not believe them. And sometimes when people have checked with the hospitals supposedly overrun with them they find out that it’s not true so there’s good reason not to believe them. I personally know of qhole groups of vaccinated people who have come down with COVID, and in one group one of them died. I mentioned this somewhere in an earlier blog post. A month or so ago by now. It's the vaccinated who are getting sic, in some cases ONLY the vaccinated..

This new variant dubbed Omicron occurred originally in vaccinated people. In fact there is reason to believe that the shots themsevles are the cause of the development of these new variants. The phenomenon of "shdding" from vaccinated people is real, that is, the vaccinated give off the virus to others around them. They are trying to blame continuing or increasing cases of COVID or its variants ON THE UNVACCINATED BUT THE REAQL SOURCE IS THE VACCINATED. There is no “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” it should be called the PANDEMIC OF THE VACCINATED.

There was no reason whatever to vaccinate children since if they get COVID they get very mild cases of it and develop antibodies. But they hit hard with a campaign to get them vaccinated, Didn’t we all hear this swet little ad about how wonderful it is that now our precious future citizens with their wonderful talents that will benevfit society can now get vaccinated? They were giving us the "good news" that children are now "eligivle" for this experience that will ensure them a bright future, or the one about how this vaccine is now "available" for them. Oh such good news. Such good news that a substance that is known to kill a certain number of its recipients and causes pain and sufferig to many others, is now “available” for your children. Oh happy day.

May bought the line. So the campaign apparently succeeded and now great numbers of children are oh so happily vaccinated against COVID by a substance that doesn't protect against COVIDE except in perhaps a very mild way, doesn't prevent transmitting it to others and may be detrimental to the health of the children as they grow up, and so on and so forth. Oh happy day.

So golly gosh, all of a sudden IN ONE WEEK cases of COVID in children have increased by 37%. No connection of course.

And that is simpl;y presented as a natural course of the virus, to be expected despite all their horrific policies to shut us up and lock us down to prevent it. Be afraid, be very afraid. That’s what they want us to feel. The more we fear the more we fall for their lies. But you won’t hear about this beause it’s just “misinformation” that gets people kicked off social media. If you want to know the truth you have to go looking for it..

All this takes me to my usual topic. That is, THERE IS NO REASON WHATEVER FOR ANYONE TO DIE OF COVID. They’ve denied us access to the treatments that would have saved at least 85% of those who died. Bad studies were promoted, even a completely fraudulent one, the propaganda is held by most medical professions these days because they are too busy to spend the time to check it out and don’t have the motivation to anyway, plus of course they are under threat of losing their jobs if they find out they’re being lied to. HCQ with zinc could have cured most, so could Ivermectin, and now we have Monoclonal antibodies but it isn’t automaticallty given to people sick with COVID. The virus could have been done away with a year ago.

I don’t think this could be motivated merely by greed though that is the most popular explanation. I could be wrong, but such a concerted effort to manipulate us suggests something much bigger and much more sinister.

I’ve been almost obsessively watching Holocaust survivor testimonies and documentaries about the Nazi era as if it might tell me what’s coming.

The Pre-Trib Questions Again. Sorry, Can't Help It.

Yes I know my questions about the end times can be offensive to Pre-Tribbers. Can't help it. Can't help having the questions.

For istance, why are they so certain the "blessed hope" of the "appearing of the Lord Jesus" refers to the Pre-Trib Rapture? Isn't it true that Jesus won't appear to the world at that time but will appear at the Second Comintg? Doesn't the word "appearing" make it NOT refer to the Rapture? We certainly all believe that Jesus' coming back, either for the Rapture or at the very end, either one, is indeed our blessed hope, but the way that concept is so adamantly claimed for the Pre-Trib Rapture is not at all convincing.

And then there is the statement "This is the first resurrection" which occurs very late in the Book of revelation, long after the Rapture which isw supposed to have preceded all the events of the Tribulation period, and yet wouldnj't the Rapture be the first resurrection? The timing raises a question about what exactly is in cluded in the first resurrection.

And as I've mdentioned before, who the martyrs under the altar in Revelation six are is still a question. Why would the martyrs among the Raptured be a separate group from these later martyrs who are wayting for yet more martyrs to join them. Why if martyrs are singled out for a special status are those from our time, those from the Inquisition, those around the world right now, why are they separated?

I can't answer thesae questions. I want the Pre-Trib Rapture to be true. I'm ready to go, the sooner the better. But nobody answers these questions, all they do is reiterate the Pre-Trib scenario.

Sigh.

Forgot one: 1 Corinthians 15 says the Rapture will occur "at the last trump" and yet nobody seems to talk abou the trupet at all. What do they think it meansw? If it's the last odf the seven trumpets in Revelation that puts it considerably after the Pre-Trib seenario. So we need to know what it means.

Remembering the Bomb Years

We'd been driving for hours in the dark, or so it seemed, the dark broken by nothing but our own headlights. It was rare to encounter another car on that road at any time of day. It might have been dark already when we came over Montgomery Pass, but my inability to see them would only have made my terror of the f the steepcliffs worse. I always dreaded that part of the tripP. The two-lane highway veered right and lift along the narrow ledge for miles and miles and miles with the cliff too closeon the side. . On one trip Daddy stopped the car and got out to look over the cliff because another car had run off and was crashed far beblow. It was too steep to get down to help anyone if there was anyone left alive to help so we drove on. He'd have reported it to the police when we got home.

I spent too much of my childhood terrified of rmany things. Montgomery Pass was one of them. As far as I know I was the onlyl one in the family who experienced that dread. Another terror was the water heater on the back porch that went out awfully frequently and had to be relit. I would run out to the porch as soon as I got up to see if the flame had gone out and would be enormously relieved if it hadn’t. . It burned oil and Daddy would let it get too full of oil and then light it by throwing a match into it which woujld ignore it with a roar and flames shooting out of the little opening. It took a long time for the roaring and flame-spitting to die down to a normal level. The idea was to get it to heat the water faster than usual but such a practical reason was lost on me. I woujld sit in school all morning worryinhg about the house going up in in flames.e. He’d light the stove the same way when the pilot went out, turp the gas up high and then stand back to light a match and toss it onto the burner which would burst into a ball of fire with a great whoosh. At least that would die down rapidly and didn’ t torture me in class..

By fourth grade I was terrified of the fallout from the bomv tests at Yucca Flats. I imagined it in the air around us as we sat in class. The school had bussed us out to a hill at the edge of town where we could see the mushroom cloud. We were told to cover our eyesy while they counted down to detonation and then we could look at the cloud. They only took us out to see it once that I recall. The pictures of it in the newreels we'd see in the movie theater on Sundays were better. But it was imagining thefallout i the air that caused the anxiety, not the bomb itself.

We only made the trip to Southern California once a year to visit relatives and it was only on that trip that I had to endure Montgomery Pass, on the trip down and then the trip back. Oddly I oly remember the blackness of the night on the trip back, I don't remember moon or stars but they must have been there. And the silence in the car. It was late enough that we kids had stopped fighting with each other, and our parents didn't talk much as I recall. So there was the sound of the engine and the tires on the asphalt.. Some of the four of us or even all of us might have been asleep by then.

Maybe Daddy said something about almost being homebecause he knew we liked to be awake for the last stretch.. The road curved widely aroudn the big shadow of a mountain on the right and that's when we could see the little necklace of lights in the distance. Home. The dead center of Nowhere.

Well, that's how Mom thoguth of Tonopaht. Being kids to us it was home for the nine years we were there. S he missed Santa Monica, her two sisters, the grenery, the avocado tree in our back yard, civilization. I was old enough at six to remember Santa Monica but her missing it was worse than any missing it of my own could ever have been. Her unhappiness was as dark a cloud as any bomb cloud could ever have been. It might have affected Bob too, he was five, but I don't know, and since he's been dead for thirty years I'll never know, not in this life anyway. The others were too young to be consciou of it until later.

Recently I was diagnosed with a thyroid condition that might qualify me for government compensation as a “downwinder” from those bomb years. The final diagnosis isn’t in yet.

"Mary" Queen of Heaven and Antichrist

This is an old movie, twenty years old or so anyway, I couldn't read the date on it, all about the apparitions of "Mary" that had been increasing up to that point. I wonder how many have appeared since then. Anyway it's a very careful biblical exploration of the nature of these apparitions and the claims made for "Mary" by the Roman Catholic Church.



As I watched it I became impressed with how literally this "Mary" is Antichrist, that is, she literally puts herself in the place of Christ by all the titles and attributes "she" claims for herself, from "Mediatrix" to "Co-Redemptrix" to sufferer for our sins and so on. When it is then shown how the popes, and particularly Pope John Paul, give glory to her and point people to her and take seriously the messages from her apparitions, it puts the popes in the position of "False Prophet," much like that second beast in the Book of Revelation chapter 13 who gives glory to the first beast that has the number 666 which we identify as the Antichrist. the False Prophet causes a statue to be made to the first beast and commands that people worship it. All this very neatly fits those themes of the Book of Revelation.

Except that it's hard to connect "Mary" or the Marian apparitions with the first beast or the number 666, at least I don't know how to make that conjnection. As I've many times pointed out here, the number 666 fits the Latin title of the Pope, "Vicar," or "Substitute" for "the Son of God." And the Pope certainly does claim to be that ssubstitute in many ways.

That is one of the reasons I keep going with the Protestant Reformers in identifying the Pope as THE Anticrhist, and the Great Apostasy as first of all the doctrines of the Roman Church, though we can also see it spreading throughout the churches in these last days. In other words I don't think we need to be looking for some unknown figure to arise in the world as the Antichrist, I think he's been year for somje 1500 years. HOWEVER, it's hard to avoid the fact that Hitler was definitely an Antichrist figure too, and Hitler had a Pope that could be said to have played the role of False Prophet to him in some sense. So Hitler being a political leader although he was also in some sense worshipped, is another reason to think the Antichrist of the end days won't be the Pope but the Pope will be the False P{rophet.

The Antichrist Beast has to fulfill the 666 identifier and so far onlyh the Pope does that I know of. And very nicely since the Latin title iself contains the very Roman numerals that add up to that number. No other candidates for that number are so neatly derived.

And it's also otherwise hard to identify "Mary" with the first beast or Anticrhist of Revelation 13. In the film she is identified with teh Harlot of Revelation 17, but that isn't very convincing either. The Harlot is a clear antithesis to the Bride of Christ, in other worse she represents the false Church, which since she rides a bedast that represents the city of Rome is clearly the Roman Church. The Mary of the apparitions is certainly a Roman Church invention who is worshipped by Popes as well as millions of Catholics, but I find it hard to identify her with the Harlot which so neatly opposes the Bride of Christ..

However, as I've mentioned from time to time here, Alexander Hislop who wrote the book "The Two Babylons" which traces the pagan religion of Babylon to the Roman Church, speculated that the Beast could be "Mary." When you see in the film the millions of people who come to adore and worship the apparitions, and all the testimonies to supernatural signs and wonders that attend tha apparitions, the connection between them and the Antichrist Beast is nhot at all farfetched. It's just that there doesn't seem to be any cleare way to identify her with the characteristics of the beast of Rebvelation 13 or the number 666 which identifies it or "him." If Hislop showed a connection with the 666 I missed it.

Nevertheless the claims of the apparitions that usurp the role of Christ, its milllionbs of worshippers, its signs and wonders, the fact that Mary is worshipped by Popes, all put "her" in the role of Antichrist, certainly AN Anticrhist, but one that has enormous religious significance.
'
Itg's also interesting that one of the apparitions specifically asks people to worship statues of her. The False Prophet will have an image made of the Beast and have the power to cause it to appear alive, and will command that people worhip it, and will have people killed who refuse. As Jan Markell has pointed out there are now gigantic statues in various parts of the world that have the unusual ability of representing anyone and make that person seem to be alive. I don't know who erected them or why, but they certainly sound like something that could fit right into that prophecy of Revelation 13.

At the very least all this just shows how very close the very End must be.

The Pope, Apparitions of "Mary" and Bringing the True Gospel to Catholics

Ex-Catholic Mike Gendron is the guest on the latest Understanding the Times radio show, discussing the role of Poe Francis in these last days. Apparitions of "Mary" are increasing around the world.

Mike Gendron has a ministry to Catholics to give them the message of salvation through Christ since they don't get that message in their churches. His website is Proclaiming the Gospel.

Questions and Thoughts for Dan Bongino about his COVID and Salvation

Got lost trying to find Dan Bongino's email so gave up to write my message here. He'll never see it out here in the cyberboonies but it's got a general message too that belongs in a post, and maybe eventually I'll find his email anyway.

Bongino took over the radio time that Rush Limbaught used to have. He's nothing like Rush but he's a strong radio host so I think he's a good replacement. I usually only hear part of his show which was also the case with Rush, or all the talk shows for that matter.

Anyway he recently reported two things about his personal life that raised issues. the first was his report of having had COVID last week, that it was a very bad case although he'd been vaccinated, and he mentioned that he was given certain treatments: I think he mentioned vitamin D but I'm bnot sure of that, though he did mention Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin and Quercetin as well as Monoclonal Antibodies. he got all this in Florida where Governor DeSantis has made treatments available to everybody.

I wondered immediately why he had such a bad case of COVID and suspect he wasn't taking anything to boost his immune system as we all should be doing. I don't know since he didn't say but I'd really like to know. We should all be taking Vitamin D above all, but C helps and Zinc is important. At least those. But prophylactic doses of Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquinea are a very good idea too and lots of people who have chosen not to be vaccinated take those things. HCQ and Quercetin are ionophores which act to open the cell to zinc. It's zinc which kills the virus. A higher dose at the beginning stage of infection is for treating the disease. But again, vitamin D is the main thing everybody should be takinprotect against the virus.

The authorities won't tell you that, all they want to do is push the vaccines, and we know by now that the vaccines do not prevent the disease. they say they protect from the worst bouts of it and from death but after what Bongino said I wonder about that too.

He was given these things as treatment, though, he reported, but he didn't mention zinc and I 'd like to know if that was merely an oversight or he wasn't given zinc. Zinc is essential with botyh HCQ and Quercetin, both of which he said he was given, so they would hve been more or less useless if no zinc was given with them. Any zin in his system from his diet would get into the cells but that is not likely to be anywhere near enough to knowck out the virus. The Ivermectin, however, should have helped, as long as it was given early enough which it sounds likme it was -- within a few days of his first symtpomns.

But from what I've been hearing it would have been the Monoclonal Antibodies (I think that's what the drug Regeneron is) are just about miraculous at curing the diseease at whatever stgage it's given, so if the other treatments didn't do much, and who knjows, that certainly would have.

Butt the question I had was whether they gave him zinc.

The other topic is about his life as a Catolic. It sounds like he's a sincere believer who prays and tries to live the Christian life, but he isn't saved and doesn't know it, as Catholics usually aren't taught the truth about salvation. At one point he said about someone else that he should realize he's going to have to give an account of his deeds when he reaches those pearly gates, as if that's what everyone will have to do. But it's only those who are not saved who will be judged by their deeds and he apparently doesn't know that. He doesn't know that Jesus died for our sins and paid the FULL price for our salvationj so that there isn't one thing for us to do except believe it and trust in it. (He might find if he ever does get saved that all that rough language he has so much trouble controlling just goes away. That's what happened to me, just about the first clue that I was saved was how my bad language just disappeared. Unfortunately it came back again later through bad company -- even though we're saive, meaing our spirit is regenerated, we will not be completely free of the flesh or sin nature until we die. In this life we have to learn to choose to “walk in the Spirit” so we won’t fall into the flesh.) but I',m motly successfully resisting it nows.)
So that's for Dan Bongino and anybody else it might apply to:

SUMMARY:

1. Was he taking anything such as Vitamin D to protect against COVID before he got sick? It’s possible hed not have had such a severe case if he had been.

2. Was he given zinc with the HCQ and Quercetin as treatment or not? If not they problably didn’t contribute anything to his recovery.

3. As a Catholic he's been deprived of the truth about salvation and he needs to recognize that we are saved ONLY by grace through faith in Christ and our good deeds have NOTHING to contribute to it. They are the result of salvation, not the means to it.

SOURCES FOR THE INFORMATION about COVID prevention and treatment: Dr. Vladimirr Zelenko, ,Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Peter McCulough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Simone Gold, Dr. Daniel Wohlgelernter, among others. h

Evolution Rant

When evolutionists talk about human institutions and culture as if evolution explains it. I mostly just get bored and annoyed. I despised Sociobiology and the claim that altruism had a physical evolutionary explanation. Blesh. Balderdash. And that was before I was a Christian. Even in those days I had problems with evolution. Some of it was about physicalistic explanations in general. Anyhthing that explained mental states in phyhsicalistic terms was abhorrent to me. I had conniption fits over Behaviorism and Behaviot Therapy which was all about "conditionint" and treated the mind as an "epiphenomen" a conceon that never acquired any meaning for me, and evolutionary theory also relegates mind to a position subordinate to physical reality.. Blesh.

I also made some effort back then to explore evolutionary tgheorybecause I diddn't like it. When I did it always seemed to keep dissolving into nonsense. I couldn't get hold of anything like an evidentiary trail for any of it.

Through all that I didn't conclude that the theory was false. I had read Darwin's Origin of Species and was impressed with his careful way of thinking things through. But you know what? Very little of it is scientific in the empirical sense. In that dichotomy between rationalism and empiricism it's rationalism. And really, so is everything they do with evolutionary thinkinjg in any context now too. it's mostly mental construction, not empirical science. I don't even know what they're talking about when they use terms like "selection" or "adaptation" these days. They apparently are saying "Such and such a behavior is there in most of the population, therefore it is the product of selection and of course it was selected because it's adaptive." that's about the extent of the evidence.

It wasn't until I read some of the creationists that I finally saw that you could go after evolutionary theory from a scientific standpoint. Then it became fun to think things through for myself. All I care about is the claim that species evolved from species. When discussion gets all wrapped up in how a particular trait emerged and functions I'm not really interested. The problem is that an evolutionary history is assumed for that trait and it's spoken of as a reality though it's nothing but a thought system.

Rationalistic ystems are a plague. Marxist is a vicious evil plague and it's all rationalistm, there isn't one anchor point in reality in Marxism. Or in the theory of evolution either.

I suppose I'll have to eat some of my words here since all I'm doing is venting and ranting. Oh well. I