A Guy from Queens Who Talks Like a Guy from Queens, or just Leftist Craziness, or Leftist Corruption or Both?

 I guess they really brelieve this stuff?  DO they really believe this stuff?  What kind of mental derangement does it take to believe this stuff?

Was Trump really trying to get the Georgia Secretary of State to break the law and come up with fake ballots to put Trump in the win?  Do they REALLY believe that's what he was doing?  What is the matter with these people?  Just as on the Ukraine call they so stupidly impeached him over, there were lots of people listening in.  There was nothing wrong with the call.  They've invented or hallucinated a wrongdoing that just is not there.   Do they REALLY REALLY REALLY believe this stuff?   I find it very hard to believe they could, but it sure sounds like they do.

So he said somethinjg like all the Secretary of State would have to do is "find" the number of votes he lost by.  Isn't the context obvious?  How couold it not be?  He's CLEARLY saying something like 

Look this is no big deal, I only lost by such and such number of botes.  You don't have to do some complicated investigation to find, say, the TRUE NUMBER OF VOTES I ACTUALLY WON BY, which was no doubt huge by comparison, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS OVERTURN THE AMOUNT OF FRAUD THAT LOST ME THAT MUCH SMALLER NUMBER OF VOTES.   

That's all.   How much of this endless attempt to bring down Trump is mere stupidity of this sort and how much the lying cheating fraudulent mentality of the Left?  I find it hard to tell sometimes.   This isn't even foot-in-mouth Queens Speak, this is a perfectly normal way of talking about the necessary steps to be taken to overturn voter fraud enough to right the wrong without REALLY doing what should be done to REALLY right it.   REALLY righting the wrong is just too much to ask of these guys so Trump is letting him off the hook:  just do the right thing enough to bring about the right result even if it's still a wrong as far as the numbers go.

This CBS excuse for a report and analysis is just beyond all sanity.  We are being run by a new kind of idiocy.  Analysis of Trump's phone call to Georgia's secretary of state - YouTube

Ivermectin, another miracle drug for treating COVID

Here's an impassioned testimony to the efficacy of Ivermectin by Dr. Pierre Kory in a Senate Hearing.  

"I CAN'T KEEP DOING THIS": Doctor pleads for review of data during COVID-19 Senate hearing - YouTube

An Especially Lucid Presentation of the Rapture and the Antichrist

Was drawn to watch a video titled" The Mark of the Antichrist Revealed" which wasn't about any mark of the Antichrist although it was about the Antichrist.  Mostly it was about the Rapture of the Church.  The speaker is Max Lucado who has written lots of Christian books that I wouldn'tt read because he's said things I recognize as heretical.  As often happens I don't remember what, just that I've had that impression for a long time and avoid him.  

However, this talk is very good and completely biblical.  He's a very clear communicator and he lays out the scripture prophesying the Antichrist, the nature of the Antichrist, the Tribulation period and the pre-Tribulation Rapture of the Church in surprisingly clear terms, succinctly.  That's why I'm posting the link to it.  

I may be wrong but I have the strong impression that this may be the very first time he's preached on these things.  If so, maybe it's a sign that churches that seem to have been shunning end times prophecy are finally going to be catching up, just in time for the unfolding of the prophesied events..  

🅽🅴🆆 Max Lucado | The Mark of the Antichrist Revealed 🔥 MUST WATCH! - YouTube

Later:  He gives the current understanding of the Antichrist that he is an unknown at this point, also that the Holy Spirit will be taken from the earth during the Tribulation period.  I've argued against both.  The Protestant Reformers identified the Anticrhist as the Pope, all the Popes, the papacy itself.  If he's THE Antichrist then a Pope must be the final Antichrist of the Tribulation period.  There are some descriptions of this figure in prophecy that don't seem to describe a man in his eighties or the present Pope, such as his having "a fierce countenance."  However, Lucado expects him to be possessed by Satan, as Judas was, and such possession could give him the energy of a much youinger man as well as a fierce countenance.  All the rest of the description fits a Pope just fine.  (There is reason to believe that Hitler, who was certainly an antichrist figure, was himself possessed by Satan.   There are those who say that his speeches were done in a voice that wasn't his own.)

And the Pope does keep popping up in international circles.  There's a picture of him with other world leaders in Jan Markell's radio show about "The Great Reset" which I've posted below.   Since the Great Reset has all the marks of the kind of global government we can expect to be in place during the Tribulation period, one would expect its future leader to be right there among its planners.   So I'm holding on to my prediction here.  If I'm wrong I'm wrong but so far I'm convinced of it.   (As for the removal of the Holy Spirit, I doubt that just becauase people are going to be coming to Christ during the Tribulation which will be a pretty fleshly weak affair unless it's brought about by the Holy Spirit.  And the Protestant Reformers interpreted the "restrainer" who must beheremoved for the Anticrhsit to be revelaed as Caesar, since he was essentially going to replace Caesar as head of a new version of the Roman Empire, The Holy Roman Empire over which the Popes presided for about a thousand years from the official emergence of the Bishop of Rome as "Universal Bishop" in 606 AD to the Protestant Reformation.  Down the centuries many Christians had recognized the papacy as the Antichrist, as did the Protestant Reformers.  I've written about all this in various posts here. 

One more thing:  The "little horn" in the Daniel prophecy who is understood to represent this coming Antichrist is seen by Daniel to disploace three others, and the Reformers interpreted this to refer to three other bishops the Bishop of Rome displaced when he was made Universal Bishop, which position is what led so many to call him the Antichrist.  So this is one more way prophecy may have already been fulfilled that the current Pretrib point of view understands to be yet future.  Time will tell.

Voter Fraud: The Whole Situation in a Nutshell

Lou Dobbs on the Voter Fraud situation, covers the gamut of conservative concerns.  followed by Tucker Carlson who also has a good program on the same subject:

Lou Dobbs Tonight 1/4/21 | Fox Business January 04, 2021 - YouTube

Tucker Carlson Tonight 01/04/21 | Fox News January 04, 2021 - YouTube

Lies are Powerful Weapons

Ilove that little walkaway video by Georgia H.  She puts her finger on so many of the insane ideas and policies of the Left.   She even recognized the essentially propagandistic nature of today's mainstream news, ends up calling it "gar-bage."  But those on the Left remain impervious to such simple honest truth about the ideology that has taken control of their minds.  

Just a few examples of propaganda masquerading as news I've heard recently.  Can't stomach it so try not to hear the news reports, I'd rather find out what's going on from the conservative talk shows.   There is no genuine mainstream journalism any more, it's all propaganda from the Left.  The most common form of it I hear is the insertion of a trashing word into an otherwise objective report:  

Trump administration lawsuits alleging the "baseless" claim of voter fraud.

The Trump legal cases concerning voter fraud aim to "overthrow the will of the poeple."   Oh is that one slimy, the whole point being to discover the true will of the people.  

A phone call with Georgia's secretary of state in which trump "falsely claimed" that he  couldn't have lost the election.   Honest journalism would report his opinion, not contradict it

The real "hate group" out there these days is the Democratic Party with its media arm.  They've succeeded in twisting the minds of half of America, and spread the seeds of what is very likely going to grow into the total destruction of America itself.  

Will They Listen before It's Too Late?

So much of what I write here, maybe all of it really, is intended for people who don't understand much of anything about anything.  Liberals, leftists, atheists and so on.  People who will be left behind when the Church is taken off the planet in the Rapture.  Lots of people in that cateogry I happen to care a lot about.  I certainly have no power to pull off such an intention, only God can do that, but I can try to do my bit and collect the necessary information.  I'm used to being hated for it by some but I still hope for them that they'll come to the truth in the end, and even if I'm not hated by others, I'm ignored and dismissed as irrelevant, I hope the same for them.  It's frustrating that I can't convince anyone now because I don't want anyone to have to go through the Tribulation, or die and go to Hell whichever comes first.  I yearn for the Rapture but I also hate to see it come before some of those I care about wake up and get saved and don't have to go through the Tribulation.   But I don't see any signs of that happening.     

The Star of Bethlehem is full of convincing evidence but I know only too well how it can be ignored or twiisted anyway.

The Great Reset I just posted about will probably sound good to the leftists.  Makes me shudder to think.  Makes me hope and pray that everntually even they will wake up and see the truth.

Of course all the Biblical prophecy is just going to go over like a lead balloon for most of them.  Yet again I hope.

I put up that video by the young woman who couldn't take any more of the Democratic Party's craziness, but I'm afraid there will be far too many who want to argue with her.

Can they also ignore the doctors who show how lifesaving drugs have been suppressed for political and economic reasons?  Oh I suppose they can.  

It leaves me as usual yearning for the Lord to come soon.  How long Oh Lord?

Star of Bethlehem recap

The remaining questions and maybe a few new ones took over my mind about an hour ago and I had to get up and do something about it.   When exactly did that conjunction between Jupiter and Regulus occur that was the first image on the astronomy screen Rick Larson shows?  He says it occurred in September of 3 BC but the shot of the rising conjunction occurred on a particular date and he doesn't give it.  Was it September 3 I wonder, the same day the crescent moon appears at the feet of the sign of Virgo, which was Rosh Hashanah?    This couldn't be discovered from an Ephemeris which only shows the planets and not a distant star like Regulus.

That's one question.  Another is the one I've mentioned before, the sign or constellation in which the conjunction between Jupiter and Venus occurred on June 2 of 2 BC.  

The more I ponder the study Rick Larson did, especially after my last post on it which helped me focus better on some elusive elements of it, the more convinced I am of this magnificent "Celestial Poem" he discovered.   Here I'll just sketch it out again:

In September of 3 BC there appeared what could be called an announcement of the birth of the Messiah in the sky as the planet Jupiter, which in this context can be regarded as a symbol of God the Father, is seen making three very close passes, or conjunctions with the distant start Regulus, the word meaning King, a star that bears the name King in many different languages.  (I just called it a "planet" and had to correct it, so I may have made that mistake in the other post too, have to correct it later if I can).   This is apparently a fairly rare and dramatic celestial event, and it is occurring in the sign or constellation of Leo, which is symbolized as a lion.  And that immediately suggests the "lion of the Tribe of Judah,: Judah being the father of the tribe from which the Messiah is prophesied to come, in the very blessing given him by his father Jacob/Israel I quoted in the previous post.  So there is definitely something very portentous about the triple conjunction of Jupiter with Regulus in Leo.  

A portent that is made all the more dramatic when the next sign or constellation to follow Leo  on September 3 of 3 BC is Virgo with the new moon at its feet, which is the exact image seen by the apostle John as he describes it in Revelation 12, the woman "clothed with the sun" which clearly refers to the sun's being in the sign of Virgo, which it always is in September, with "the moon at her feet," which on that very date of September 3 was the new moon of Rosh Hashanah or Jewish New Year.  does sort of give one goose bumps to appreciate these things.   She is described further in Revelation 12 as having a crown of twelve stars on her head.  This is what makes her a symbol of the nation of Israel.  It harks back to the dream Joseph had in which his eleven brothers were stars that bowed down to him.  I hope I'm remembering this right because I'm not going to look it up yet.  The point is that the tribes of Israel are depicted as twelve stars..  In fact I think I'm going to take back my statement in the previous post that Virgo represents Mary although she was the literal bearer of the Messiah,  because Israel the nation is often described as the bearer of the Messiah and this image better symbolizes the whole nation.   Also, the lines of scripture that are sung in Handel's "Messiah" happen to be fresh in my mind from listening to it over the holidays:  "For unto us a son is given... and His name shall be called "Wonderful, Counsellor, Almighty God, the Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace."   He is given "unto us."  

So Rosh Hashanah, September 3 of 3 BC certainly does appear to be the likely date of the conception of the Messiah, the date when the angel Gabriel appeared to Mary to announce her blessed appointment to be the mother of this lolng-awaited Savoir prophesied in the Hebrew scriptures reaching as far back as Eden.  And at the same time, probably beginning at that very moment but it's not clear from Larson's presentation, the event is being heralded by the planet Jupiter's dance around the star Regulus in the sign of the Lion of the Tribe of Judah.  Maybe you have to know the scriptures for this to make your hair stand on end.

And it's all capped by the discovery of the brightest "star" ever seen -- on June 2 of 2 BC nine months later, this star being the magnification of the light of the two planets Jupiter and Venus as they come together in the closest possible conjunction without the light of one cancelling out the light of the other but instead adding to it.  If this really was the brightest celestial object ever seen then there is no doubt that this was the star described in the gospel of Matthew.  I was hoping to find an Ephemeris online that might identify it but it's beyond the endurance of my failing eyesight if it's out there at all.  What I did find didn't get anywhere near that time and date.  It would be on Larson's astronomy program and he didn't identify exactly when it appeared though on his website he gives Christ's birth as June 2 so I assume that's when it appeared.  He also doesn't identify the constellation or sign in which it appeared and I remain curious about that since all these things have some symbolic significance related to the events of Christ's life and death.  In the previous post I guessed that if He was born in the sign of Gemini, which encompasses June 2, then its symbol The Twins could be interpreted as reflecting His two natures as God and Man.  .    

..  

After that we see Jupiter leading the Magi to the six months old King of the Jews in the town of Bethlehem and standing over the town just as we are told the star did in Matthew 2, the standing still being the point at which the planet stopped moving forward from the point of view of someone on Earth and prepared to reverse course or go into retrograde.  All these things are happening in reality in the sky right on schedule.

And the grand finale whicn leads Larson to think of it all in terms of a Celestial Poem is the rising of the sign of Virgo at the very time Jesus died on the cross, with the moon again at her feet, only this time a full moon and a full moon in eclipse, otherwise known as a blood moon.

To that I add the point that His death occurred at Passover, which in that year as Larson showed was on April 3 of 33 AD, occurring in the sign of Aries the Ram which of course reflects His mission as the Lamb of God, the ultimate sacrifice to which all the sacrifices of the sacrificail system of Israel had pointed since Moses, but specifically the sacrifice of the lamb whose blood was painted on the doorposts of the houses of the Israelites on the night the angel of death passed over the Israelites before their exodus from Egypt toward the Promised Land.   The way all the separate strains of symbolism work together all pointing to this event is staggering.  

It's all there.  

"Christ Quake" is a recent film Larson did, about the earthquake that occurred at Christ's death, apparently unrelated to the astronimcal events recorded in The Star of Bethlehem.  I'm still preoccupied with  the star and Quake is not available for viewing online yet