"News" that's Really Lying Provocative Propaganda for the Left is One of the Evils We Need to Stand Up To.

Speaking of standing up to evil powers, one of the headlin3es that greeted me yesterday created the usual helpless feeling of being cornered by lies we have no way of countering. It happens all the time, it was rampant in the Trump years but it hasn't stopped. Why the media want to destroy this country I'm not sure, I suppose they are duped by Communism same as so many others are these days and suppose themselvewas to be righteous instead of supporters of mayhem and murder.

Anyway the headline that punched me in the stomach this time was

Gohmert downplays January 6 riot in speech from the House floor, falsely claiming 'no evidence' of armed insurrection.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gohmert-downplays-january-6-riot-in-speech-from-the-house-floor-falsely-claiming-no-evidence-of-armed-insurrection/ar-BB1gK2A1?ocid=msedgntp

"Falsely claiming" is the evil evil addition to what should be a simple statement of what Gohmert said and nothing more, if there were any such thing as honest objective reporting going on. But of course there isn't these days, we get headlines and stories all the time that pretend to objectivity but are really leftwing -- oh yes it is always leftwing -- opinion. Propaganda. We don't get to condsider what Gohmert said on our own, as intelligent human beings. we must be fed the Communist interpretation of what he said. We must be made to understand that what he said was false because that's the only line the leftwing will allow. And it's discouraging to think that there must be a lot of people who take it straight and that's why they know they can get away with it.

So I read the CNN story to find out what he said and why it's false. He was objecting to the media narrative that the entry into the Capitol building on January 6 was an "armed insurrection" and CNN won't let him make this objection cuz they want to paint a picture of an evil right wing insurrection fomented by Donald Trump. But if you read the story all they are saying is that ONE of the participants was "either carrying or had access to" a firearm. Golly Gosh, EITHER carrying or had access to and they don't knbow which. Does ONE participant maybe possibly carrying but not using, or merely having access to, a firearm, constitute an "armed insurrection?" Well, idiotically, insanely, they want their readers to think so and apparently think their readers are stupid enough to accept such a ridiculous statement. Also apparently some were "armed" with other kinds of "weapons" although oddly these "weapons" were not described. Surely even the average liberal out there can see through this craziness

I don't know how to judge the January 6th event myself but I know when all I'm getting is leftwing spin that prevents me from finding out what really happened. Even from CNN's article it's clear this was no "armede insurrection" for pete's sake. Oh I see farther down the page that they list a baseball bat, a chemical spray, and a knife? as other weapons found on a few people. But remember that onlyh one personwas killed by the violence itself, and that was a woman shot to death by the police as she climbed through a window. A polieman who died died of a heart attack or something like that though for a while the media tried to pin i t on the "violence." Anyway if this was an armed insurrection it was the most inept armed insurrection in the history of the world.

Also it had absolutely nothing to do with anything Trump did or said on that day. It was planned in advance and Trump hadn't even finished his speech when the first people entered the Capitol buliding. Also he said nothing in the slightest bit provocative. He mentioned the plans some had to peacefully protect in front ot fht eCapitol, that's all, and this constant line about how he caused the event is just lying propaganda, which i guess those on the left believe because, well, those on the left believe what the leftwing media tell them. Sad to say.

And that brings me to Liz Cheney. Sigh. She talkk a solid conservative line until she gets to her recent refrain about how the Republican Party has to give up on Trump because they must be a party of the truth. And her idea of how it isn't currently a party of truth is based totally on Trump's continuing belief that the election was unfair, and that he was responsible for the "insurrectioN" on January 6th.

Well, that second accusation is a complete lie. Does she believe it? I guess she must but I can't see how she talked herself into it. And concerning the election she seems to think Trump is the source of the allegations of fraud. But all that came from witnesses to the fraud. I don't know if I even heard Trump mention it until later, but I did hear many many witnesses on many news programs destcribe many kinds of fraud, some small scale but some big enough to raise serious questions about its effect on the election, such as truckloads of ballots delivered in the dead of night. For the courts to refuse to consider the evidence so that we could finally find out whether the election was affected or not is in my opinion some kind of crime.

All kinds of evil we need to stand up to these days. All kinds of drime, much of it actually treasonous. all of it coming from the Left.

Studies of Ivermectin Used for Prevention of COVID-19

My favorite liberal couple who do the Dark Horse Podcast once a week discussed studies of Ivermectin this week, among other things. Sometimes what they discuss doesn't interest me, but this one does. I started watching them last year because they were talking about the rioting in downtown Portland, and they still do from time to time but not in this podcast. They sometimes drive me crazy being liberals and evolutionists but their liberalism is mostly of the classical sort and not the current perniciously Marxist sort, they are honest observers too, and while their allegiance to evolution causes me a lot of painful eyerolling there's usually enough of what I appreciate about them to balance that out. \

Anyway, from about 26:oo they are discussing studies of Ivermectin mostly as a prophylaxis or preventative against the virus rather than a treatment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxTODvTNHlw

Although I still accept what Dr. Zelenko and many others (Drs. Harvey Risch, Simone Gold, Daniel Wohlgelernter among others) have said about the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine for treating the virus in the early days of infection, for some time I've been convinced that Ivermectin is even better at both prevention and treatment than HCQ.

HCQ is to be taken with zinc because it works as an ionophore to get zinc into the cells where it is the zinc that does the antiviral work by interfering with replication; whereas Ivermectin works in some other way that's not clear to me yet, something to do with interfering with the spike protein the vurus manufactures. (That is discussed on this podcast but I'm adding the information about HCQ from other sources I've mentioned before.) Both are used with an antibiotic, HCQ usually with Azithromycin, which Dr. Zelenko explained as a treatment for the lung infection that is a part of infection with COVID-19. Maybe that's the same reason the antibiotic Doxycycline is used with Ivermectin but I don't see why it would be used before a person actually has the virus. Anyway there's more to understand about all this, but Ivermectin looks like the best way to go for anyone who has not yet had the virus, both as preventative and as treatment in the early days of infection if it occurs.

Bret and Heather, the podcast couple, also discuss the political issues involved in this which are depressing in the extreme. That is, ivermectin was known to be both safe and effective for COVID long before the vaccines came out, and that being the case there was no justification whatever for the emergency use authorization for the vaccines since Ivermectin effectively prevents and treats the virus. This has bothered me for months already in relation to HCQ which was banned last year although it was known -- KNOWN -- to cure the virus if used in the first week of infection with COVID. This was said over and over and over by doctor after doctor after doctor, starting with Zelenko and including at least the other three I mention above but manyh more than that. As Bret and Heather point out, withholidng an effective drug is criminal. As many others have been saying for a year now, it's a crime against humanityh. This applies to the banning of HCQ as well as to Ivermectin which is also discouraged. As the number of COVID deaths rose while HCQ was banned I just felt sick and helpless. This ban was killing people. Dr. Zelenko called the AMA the American Murder Association for banning HCQ. It's the same thing with Ivermectin, with ANY effective treatment and they've had both of these all along. The evidence of safety was known for botht over decades, and its efficacy had lots of evidence from indepencndent doctors, but they excused theirmurder by demanding trials that couldn't be done in the time allotted while the trials already done were sufficient to justify its use. And of course this kind of informqation is censored by nonmedical keepers of social media too. It's hard to avoid some pretty horrifying conclusions from all this.

What should happen is that all the medical personnel who have let themselves be politically intimidated into withholding effective treament should mount a huge protest en masse, defy the orders en masse, get hold of the effective drugs and administer them accordeing to the known protocols. It would have to be "en masse" because it would be less likely that large numbers would be fired. HOWEVER, what we need these days is GUTS to stand up against the evil powers.

Baa! ! (The Only Wool Here is Being Pulled Over Our Eyes By the Evolutionists)

Well, I feel another bleat coming on this morning. Yeah, they chide us for supposedly not understanding what the term "theory" means in scientific circles. Cuz we like to complain that evolution is "only a theory." A Theory, you know, is as good as a fact, you know, don't we call it The Theory of Relativity for instance, or The Theory of Gravity? Of course they perfectly well know the point we are trying to make, they just prefer to obscure it and sticking to pedantic definitions is one way to do that.

If "theory" isn't acceptable, "hypothesis" isn't going to do it either. The point is that the whole conceptual edifice of the Theory of Evolution is a house of cards, nothing but a mental contruct, a castle in the air, with no reality supporting it. They think they have evidence. They don't. What they claim for evidence is actually evidence for the Creationist view, they've merely co-opted it, appropriated it to their own belief system. They sprinkle their biological observations, which are in themselves usually quite sound, with evolutionistic assumptions that have no inherent relation to the subject matter.

So such and such a feature of a particular creature was "evolved" to do whatever it does. The term is tacked on, it's assumed, but in reality the feature was built into the creature's genome already all the way back at the Creation, and emerged in the normal course of the shuffling done by sexual recombination. Either that or it's part of the Body Plan that's fixed in the genome, goes back to the Creation and defines the creature and doesn't get shuffled.

I guess there's no point in reiterating what i've already said a million times about this. Or maybe there is but I'm not up to it at the moment. You'd think all those formidable IQ points that are bestowed upon the nonscience of evolution could finally figure out that they are simply lost in the thicket of an elaborate mental virtual reality. It doesn't exist.

Bleat.

The Blathering Blogger Blathers On Into the Void ISaving America Part 7?)

Well lessee, they're destroying the economy. Soon things will be so outrageously expensive ... well it's hard to imagine just how bad it could get but very very bad for sure. They are flooding the country with illegals, they are bringing back "refugees" who are America-haters, they are lying about the rioting going on in major cities and allowing it to happen by preventing the police from stopping it; they areare silencing those who have known how to cure COVID for a year now and promoting vaccines that may kill a bunch of us; they are silencing truth and sanity and promoting tyranny and oppression and divisive politics, they are supporting terrorists against Israel, they are arming nations that are enemies of the West, they are forcing normal children to pretend there are more than two sexes. Lessee, how much worse can it get?

Again, though, I have to remind myself that this must all be God's judgment on the nation. We pushed Him out so now He's abandoned us to the most outrageous evil stupidities the fallen human race is capable of. Well maybe not quite that bad yet. I guess it could be worse. Looks like it will get there soon enough.

Only a Christian can know that God's judgment is at work. Unbelievers think it's only human error or human malice, if they see anything wrong at all, and if if they see it they'll blame it on the wrong people too because we've finally reached that point in human history when it's about as bad as it can get. If we aren't at the very door of the Great Tribulation I hate to think how bad it will have to get before we are. Not "we" of course since I expect to escape it in the Rapture.

There was a time though when even unbelievers were immersed in the biblical worldview and understood the basics about the Fall and redemption and talked in tbose terms. Marxism. at ;east Cultural Marxism, and Postmodernism have so corrupted people now that we can hardly have a conversation between the two worldviews at all the starting assumptions are so at odds.

God promised to save Sodom if there were even a few rightoues people left in it, so we know that He would save us on the same principle. We don't depend, that is, on the great number of unbelievers to join us in saving the country and that's a great blessing. So if He isn'[t listening to us it has to be because we believers aren't meeting His conditions.

He isn't hearing our prayers for revival. Even if, say, Mark Levin came up with a solid plan to bring us back to sanity why would He bless that either? The WTC was destroyed by Islamic jihadists but contrary to what would seem to make sense, instead of our being able to defeat them they are if anything gaining ground in this country since then. This can only be because 9/11 didn't succeed at being the wake-up call it should have been, a call to national repentance. Although I don't think Jonathan Cahn's prophetic message about the correspondence between our response to 9/11 and Israel's response to the invasion of her enemies as described in Isaiah 9/11 was needed to make the point, still it DOES make that point on top of what we should already have known anyway: If God gives us a warning through our enemies, causes destruction in our cities, and we ignore Him, saying "You can't do this to us, we'll just r4ebuild bigger and better" (Anybody noticed that the slogan of the Great Reset project -- :\"Build Back Better" -- is essentially the same message? And note that an attack on the WTC isn't just a warning to America but to the world -- It's the WORLD Trade Center ya know. so the WEF Great Reset is founding itself on the same defiance of God described in Isaiah 9:11.) Anyway that being the response of the US and the world itself we can't expect God to hold back His judgments against us.

This is all too much "woo" for the fallen mind of course. But the problem is it's even too much woo for some believers, or too "exclusive" for them more precisely I suppose, they are so theologically weak in these postmodern days. Too many have, succeumbed to much of the propaganda that relegates biblcal Christianity to being merely one among many ways to God so the fact that Jesus is the only way isn't even upheld by some appalling number of us. If they even are of "us."

I know I'm rambling on and nobody is listening anyway since Google did whatever they did to keep people from finding my blogs. I don't know why they bothered, I wasn't getting more than a few hundred people anyway. But now hardly any, probably just the Google gestapo looking in from time to time. So maybe I don't try hard enough under the circumstances. Still, I believe God got me going on these blogs and He has His reasons.

Yes I think He wanted me to write about the head covering if nothihng else. And the way I kept stumbling onto information about the Antichrist even when I wasn't pursuing that topic had to come from Him. So He'll do with it whatever He wants to do. I write because I'm driven to write, so I thank Him for the opportunity. Thank You Lord. May any glory be Yours. Even if one person gets something out of it...? '.

Saving America Part 6: The Impossible Dream of Recovery: Prayer, Repentance, Reeducation, Biblical Foundations

Chris Pinto's documentary, The True Christian History of America to my mind succeeded in establishing that Christian history beyond anything I had thought. I knew the country was originally settled by Christians with a solid Christian worldview, that the Mayflower Compact was a Christian conception, that here and there we see court judgments that affirm the Christian nature of America, and that the population was predominantly Christian even into the 20th Century. The book "The Light and the Glory" written back in the seventies painted a very strong Christian portrait of the nation through the writings of the founding generation, but somehow its arguments didn't make the case for me the way Pinto's film seems to. In fact Pinto's first documentary films about America managed to undo any idea of America's Christian character by tracing the pagan influences involved in it as well as the decidedly NONChristian thinking of Washington, Adams, Jerfferson and Franklin (The Hidden Faith of the Founding Fathers for instance). That kind of blew The Light and the Glory out of the water for me, although I was aware nevertheless that there was a great Christian influence in the country that was getting buried by too much emphasis on the nonChristian side of it. The Light and the Glory left itself open to such treatment, however, by focusing only on the Christian elements and ignoring the other side of it.

But with this latest film Pinto has not only restored the Christian character of the country, but shown the Christian inspiration behind the governing principles in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitujtion. The film traces the principles of liberty and justice that are the bedrock of our Constitutionaql Republic back to their origins in Christian thought. Phrases you thought were invented in relation jto America turn out to go back centuries, to Christiaqn leaders in Europe, and especially in England.

It is always a mistake in a fallen world to make too much of the personalities of those who have contributed great ideas to the benefit of humanity. People have all kinds of moral failings and yet can produce valuable concepts for the formation of a great nation. Thomas Jefferson rejected the supernatural and was no Christian but nevertheless made use of the Christian-inspired concepts of freedom and justice in what became foundational to America. Although John Adams was a Unitarian he made strong statements affirming the Christian worldview as essential to the character of the new nation. Even Thomas Paine who was personlly an atheist contributed a biblical framework in his "Common Sense" pamphlet that had such a strong influence on the American Revolution. Later he revealed his personal opposition to those biblical principles. This is shown in Pinto's film.

And of course many of them held slaves, in a time when it was a common practice all over the world (and still is outside of the West). The fact that they made provision for freeing their slaves and strongly opposed the practice (it was opposed on the basis of biblical Christian principles) is unfortunately lost on today's small-minded ideologues. God help us with these vicious mental midgets in charge of the nation today.

I'll say again, however, that it is our own fault since we've failed to oppose the treasonous workings of the Marxist America-haters. We're good at verbalizing the problem, lousy at doing anything about it. However, it's also true I think that we haven't had the right knowledge to support us, and I do think that Pinto's film could set us on the right track. The Christian nature of America is in those principles spelled out down the centuries as the film shows, it is not in personaliites, character flaws or personal qualities of any kind, it is in the intellectual heritage itself based on the Bible.

There are of course many unbelievers who love America and appreciate the principles of liberty and justice that have made America great, who see the danger of losing the great American experiment in the current political zeitgeist and strive to their utmost to find a way back. Although some of them might acknowledge that Christianity played some part in its formation, some would deny it altogether, and if we have any hope at all of restorng the nation we need to educate everybody out of that misonception. So many things we need to do, somehow float a massive education project needed at a time when censorship of the truth prevails, reform the churches, succeed at convincng God to give us reival.... That's why I think we've lost America and will never be able to recover her. Still, even in the teeth of such impossibilities I keep hoping I'm wrong. God is, after all, the God of the Impossible.

Speaking of passionate patriotic unbelievers, I suspect that some of the books Mark Levin has written would be very useful for the reeducation project that is so necessary. Although I probably won't be able to read it because my eyes are getting so bad, I did order his latest, American Marxism, which will be out in July. He wants to save the nation as much as I do, I hope he has a plan we can use. His books have great subjects and great titles, like Liberty and tyranny that sound like they would do well as a platform for a reeducation project in what Amrica is all about, wish I were still able to read long volumes like that.

. Speaking of what America is all about, it was a jarring experience, though illuminating. to find out that the MAGA slogan was felt as "a poke in the eye" to some who haven't had it so great in America, particularly blacks. Hearing that, I finally understood the otherwise incomprehensible hatred of that slogan, and was appalled at the narrowness that makes such an equation. That notion alone accounts for much of the Great Political Divide that's taken over the country in the last few decades.In this age of Marxist anti-Americanism everything is now about people, oppressor and oppressed class warfare that pits groups against each other, completely undoing the work of centuries toward a genuine equality. America had just about eradicated racism, cedrtainly at least institutional or systemic racism (the statistics are there only the left never hears about them), but now it's being made into the main problem in the country, just out of the blue because it makes for good political divisiveness to bring it down, the only possible reason snce it had been so effectively done away with there is no other excuse. Now we're actually getting real racism in the targeting of the white race as peculiarly evil. TAhe most evil propaganda ever concocted, and extremely dangerous. It reminds me of the propaganda campaign against the Tutsits that eventually provoked the Hutus into slaughtering them, a Catholic bishop on the radio demeaning them with such epithetcs as "cockroaches." Like how the Nazis propagandized against the Jews. Propaganda is the weapon of the fascistic mind. And this version we have now is conjured up out of Cultural Marxism with the Marxist agenda to destroy civilization and bring in their trannical form of government. They silence the voices of truth, they try to do away with the means of protecting people and property, they put good for evil and evil for good and so far they've been getting away with it.

What makes America great IN SPITE OF FALLEN HUMAN NATURE, is the principles of our founding, concepts of liberty and justice for all hammered out over centuries, grounded in a Biblical worldview. Keeping selfish fallen human nature from turning into tyranny was the motivation for designing American institutions to minimize its influence. Checks and balances among the branches of governement for instance were one protection against tyranny. They are trying to take that away now and establish a one-party rule .So they would remove this fundamental wisdom of America's vision and create a tyranny to end all tyrannies. Utopias always either disintegrate or lead to tryanny. Ignorance of the wisdom of the American vision is at least one reason this is happening here now. The fallen nature has been made the standard and God help us all. The main political tactic on the left today is intimidation by character assassination, as far as you can get from the American vision. Rule by Law is supposed to eliminate dependence on any particular human being or party or ideology, because they are inherently untrustworthy. It takes vigilance to maintain a government based on law and principle and now that the forces of evil have gained the upper hand we aren't going to be getting any benevolent dictators, we're going to get the most destrucrtive ideology ever invented to rule over us.

To take MAGA as "a poke in the eye" to anyone is to show a terrible ignorance of what America is all about. MAGA simply recognized that we'd come a long way based on our American principles, were a power in the world for good, had finally done away with the grossest forms of inequality which are endemic to fallen human nature, practiced a capitalism that brought the greatest prosperity to the greatest number. and really did allow for liberty of its citizens. MAGA was the statement of the opposition to the anti-American Marxist wrecking ball that was already doing its damage. The wrecking ball seems to have a lot of friends so they killed MAGA and all those American gains are what they are now taking away from us as fast as they can lest another MAGA come along. And it's our own fault.

God help us. God have mercy.

How We Lost America

At the end of his film on the Christian History of America, Chris Pinto quotes American founder Samuel Adams from a speech he made just before signing the Declaration of Independence, that now would commence "the reign of Political Protestantism."

That's what it should have been, and to a large extent it was, but even from the beginning there were the seeds of its destruction planted, in the Deistic mentality of some of the founding generation, and even in the documents that should have guaranteed the reign of Political Protestantism, as over time they became subject to the misinterpretations and manipulations of the fallen mindset.

In this fallen world it takes extraordinary dedication to preserve the Christian worldview because it is not natural to fallen humanity. All revivals deteriorate, at least because we get complacent and forget to work to preserve them. Then we get dull and don't even recognize when God's principles are twisted into their opposite. When the First Amendment becomes a protection for pornography and for pagan religions including even Satanism, and Constitutional rights and freedoms are claimed for the murder of unborn babies and Gay Marriage, it ought to be apparent to anyone who has even a vague understanding of the spirit of the original that it has been twisted and turned on its head. When our rights and freedoms are extended to our enemies against us how do we get back to their true meaning?


Perhaps we can't. Perhaps it's all downhill now.

Jonathan Cahn gives a stirring message to President Biden about his support for godless policies, and says only revival will save us now. Of course he's right, and many Christians pray fervently for revival. Yet it isn't happening. I've given my opinmion about why not and what it would take to make it possible, and there are probably other reasons I'm missing. But it doesn't look promising at all. It looks like downhill it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrCtoQUXnmc

Recently I've been watching The Truth Project for the second time. It's at You Tube, a series of talks by Del Tackett put out by Focus on the Family, that does a good job of spelling out the opposition between the Christian worldview and the worldview of fallen humanity. It shows how the fallen mentality has been taking over. Yes it does look like it's all downhill now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm_D9Vva_Q0

COVID Politics, COVID Vaccination Politics

Laura Ingraham interviews Dr. Paul Alexander about his reasons children should not get the COVID vaccination:

https://rumble.com/vgs2gn-former-hhs-covid-advisor-dr.-paul-alexander-do-not-give-covid-shots-to-chil.html

Tucker Carlson interviews Dr. Peter McCullough about doctors' refusal to give COVID patients the potentially lifesavking drugs HCQ or ivermectin:

https://rumble.com/vgqayr-something-is-up.-therapeutic-nihlism-is-worldwide.html