The Genocidal Insanity and/or Stupidity of Critical Race Theory

James Lindsay, probably the one with the most knowledge on Critical Race Theory today, gives its history and an an analysis if CRT and Wokeness.

Dealing with the Dangers of the Vaccines; and Dr. Zelenko Needs to Change His Diet to Cure His Cancer

Most of my sources on COVID, the vaccines, antivirals and so on, are now scattered all over the internet, some in pieces, and I'm not going to get them all together for some time. I can name the participants at least so others can track them down. Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Steve Kirsch, Dr. Richard Fleming, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko. There are others.Most of these are warning about the vaccines and objecting to the suppression of information about their dangers and about the efficacy of treatments such as HCQ and Ivermectin.

In this post I'm mainly reacting to a long interview of Dr. Zelenko by Dr. Mercola. The whole thing is interesting in my opinion, but probably the most imporant part is the advice for people who have had the vaccines, to protect against possible health problems as a result. That's discussed from roughly about 41 for the next fifteen or so minutes. The same protocols recommended for prevention of the virus itself and for early treatment of it are also effective for this purpose: HCQ or Ivermectin and if you can't get those then at least get zinc, quercetin, vitamin C and Vitamin D3.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HrBxKWxB8dkZ

Since I like to follow some of the health gurus online, although I can't say I'm good at taking their advice -- at least I pretty much know what their advice is -- I get a bit upset hearing that Dr. Zelenko has been suffering from cancer and has had a recent recurrence and all he does is the standard treatment of chemo and what4ever else is recommended. He's lost a lung to the cancer already. At least he continues to survive and is grateful to God, but oh how I wish HE paid attention to these health gurus because I am convinced that the right diet can cure cancer. A totally plant-based mostly raw diet.

At least a quart and a half of carrot juice every day, plus lots of raw fruits and veggies, tons of greens, plus nuts and seeds. There's a lot more but that's the basics and probably in most cases enough. (Check out "Chris Beat Cancer.")

American Liberty Versus Marxist Tyranny: Who's Winning?

I was still half asleep from my afternoon's long nap -- can't sleep at night much any more so the daytime gets wiped out as I sleep through most of it -- anyway I woke up in time to hear Mark Levin reading from his book that's due out on the 13th, "American Marxism." He read from various drafts of the Declaration of Independence and from various state constitutions, all of which used different language to say the same thing that ended up in the Declaration. It really helps to give a perspective when you hear the different ways of saying the same thing. He also read from Paine's "Common Sense." Knowing more about these thigns should improve our understanding of what the founding of America was really all about.

Then he read from some early American Marxists. Scary stuff. Aggressive intent to overthrow the American government, denigration of the framers, promotion of the utopian dream that has murdered hundreds of millions, and yet people are still attracted to this stuff. Right now the country is already undergoing the first phases of a Marxist revolution, pushed by the Democratic Party and not very well opposed by most on the conservative side either. We're a bunch of ignoramuses about all these things.

I've still got the words of a friend going around in my head from a few months ago, when I asked her opinion of the censorship of conservatives on the social media. Well I don't remember her exact words but the gist of her answer was that she doesn't think "misinformation" should be given a public platform. Something like that. About that same time she asked me if I'm a white supremacist which was a real punch in the stomach, knocked the bottom out of our friendship. I forgave her, I tried hard for the next few weeks to keep the friendship intact, but I couldn't overcome the effect of her remarks. The friendship had died and there was nothing I could do about it.

She was just echoing the leftist propaganda which has been pumped into liberal minds for years now. They don't even know it's Marxism and radically opposed to everything America was meant to be. Ideas have consequences and Marxism is the most pernicious ideology in force right now, bringing down everything good in this country. And they think they are doing a good thing apparently. When all the conservatives are gone they'll think utopia can now thrive? it will kill them too because they don't understand what it is, they have no idea what they are doing.

Marx's thinking was influenced by an important Jesuit in his time, a connection that is common but hardly ever noticed in the lives of Marxists. Chris Pinto is the one I'm aware of who has the most to say about this kind of connection. The Roman Church is behind the world class murderous doctrines of the last century, all the genoicdes, which I've pointed out here and there in my posts.* Mark Levin can trace the Marxist indoctrination behind them, but Pinto gets beneath that to the Jesuits. The average Catholic knows nothing about all this so they can keep up their false Christian facade, but the papacy is still waiting for its chance to bring back the Inquisition, which is what all the political genoides have been based on. it will certainly be the centerpiece of the seven-year Tribulation period that will follow the Rapture, or disappearance of the Church.

We know Who wins in the end but getting there is going to hurt those who have to go through it. <

=============================================================

* The Roman Catholic connection to the genocides. I put up a list of books on my Roman Catholicism blog, some of which have titles directly related to this claim. "Hitler's Pope" for instance. I've mentioned the role of a Catholic Bishop whose radio talks incited the Hutus to slaughter the Tutsis in Rwanda by calling the Tutsis "cockroaches" and generally using the same kind of propaganda against them that Hitler used against the Jews. Character assassination is the main Marxist modus operandi but obviously that includes all forms of fascism which could be shown to have the same ideological root. That's what they are doing to conservatives in America, calling us racists and white supremacists and xenophobes and so on and so forth, just because they don't like our politics and want us silenced so their politcs can control everybody. That's what they did to Donald Trump from the moment he declared his candidacy, and are still doing to him, not one iota of which he deserves.

Other clues to this connection include the use of the dunce cap in Mao's takeover of China, to humiliate dissenters. I didn't know it but found out that the dunce cap originated with the Inqauisition. Another connection was the use of a version of the iron maiden torture device that was used against dissenters in Ceaucescu's Romania. This was shown in the film about the imprisonment of Richard Wurmbrand I saw recently, Tortured for Christ, based on Wurmbrand's book. He was held in an underground prison for fourteen years for the crime of being a Christian. Anyway, the film pointed out the use of a wooden box about the size of a casket in which prisoners were forced to stand for hours trying to avoid being punctured by the hundreds of nails that line the inside of the box. The iron maiden was a torture tool of the Inquisition. That connection wasn't mentioned in the film, it's just something most of us know and one source of this information is the ex Catholic priest richard Bennett, whose website is still up as far as I know.

The COVID Gulag Again.

Saw my Primary Care person yesterday. She rather snapped at me about keeping my mask up since I'm not vaccinated (it's hard to breathe in that thing and I'd dropped it to my chin while there was nobody in the room but me). We went through the reasons I was there, she put through an order for lab work. She didn't push the vaccine on me exactly but she did say it 100% "prevents death." Huh? I'm not good at thinking fast in conversation --that's why I write -- or I might have pointed out that 6000 deaths due to the vaccines have been reported to the official NIH site by medical people, and that must be just a drop in the bucket of the real number. Not to mention the injuries from it which can be pretty debilitating, including convulsions.

But I did say I would like to be prescribed Ivermectin because I am convinced it both prevents COVID and treats it effectively and should be regarded as just as good as being vaccinated as far as protection of self and others goes. She said she's read the studies and it's not very effective. My answer to that should have been, Well we know it's safe and can't hurt because of decades of use on billions of people and I can point you to many doctors who have used it very successfully. I don't know about those studies but there were so many stupid studies of HCQ this must be the same sort of thing. Doctors who USE the drug KNOW it works and studies are often based on misusing it, prescribing it too late to help or in the wrong dosage, and so on.

I've now heard MANY doctors testifying to its effectiveness and the criminality of its suppression. And of course those testimonies have been censored by nonmedical politically motivated watchdogs who must have some sort of vested interest in vaccines and against effective treatments. Killing us off perhaps? Sometimes these testimonies get moved to less restrictive sites but I've been finding it hard to navigate those other sites. What I find is often just parts of a program, not the whole thing. I don't know why, seems odd if the site is supposed to be a freer source of information.

I'd like to get some Ivermectin and I do have some possible sources so maybe I will. But because of my eyes I do need help navigating application forms and that sort of thing. However, two things: what I take should be pretty effective anyway, the zinc-quercetin combo plus some immune-boosting vitamins, AND I think I may have had COVID. Yes, although I've been pretty totally isolated for a long time, seeing only my brother who does my shopping and takes out the garbage once a week, who has not been sick and is now vaccinated, I got a mild "cold" a few months ago, no idea how I coujld have but I did, very mild, just a runny nose basically, the usual week, but what makes me think it might have been COVID is that I absolutely could not taste the dill weed I put on a cucumber salad. I didn't make the connection at the time and I didn't notice if other foods didn't have much taste, only that one because dill weed is a pretty strong flavor and I couldn't taste it at all though I kept adding more and more of it. I thought maybe the cold interfered with tasting it which I guess can happen, but not to that extent. Was it old and dead or what? No, because I'd been using it for weeks and could taste it fine. Funny it didn't occur to me at the time that it could have been COVID. It was some time afterward that it occurred to me.

I forgot to mention it to my Primary Care lady. Alas.

There have been two or three discussions about ivermectin and the problem of censorship that I thought I'd eventually post here, that have disappeared. This stuff is scary. Do liberals care if the liberal social media censor us conservatives or the doctors who object to vaccines and believe HCQ and Ivermectin could have saved lives? If my Primary person is so heavily propagandzied I know most people out there are too. Sad state of affairds. The country is disintegrating before our eyes. Shouldn't even the liberals care or are they really into having a Communist revolution and destroying the Constitution and everything that made America great?

O happy happy.

The Evils of Evolutionary Theory

Talk given at an Intelligent Design conference on the horrible effects of evolutionary theory in history, from racial genocie to abortion to anti-humanity movements.



Fact is, all these evils do logically follow from the ToE even if everybody wants to deny them today.

I'm not a fan of Intelligent Design although I think their arguments for the necessity of design in nature are good. Of course I like my own arguments which are more in the biblical Creationist camp.

Sean McDowell and Steve Miller on Near-Death Experiences: They Prove a Little but Deceive a Lot

OK I listened to more of the Sean McDowell interview of Steve Miller about Near-Death Experiences. They are talking about scientific studies of these phenomena, thousands of such expeiences all around the worle it turns out.



What most seems to fascinate them is the separation of the soul from the body. I tend to get impatient with this kind of focus because I long ago answered that question for myself, both from scripture and personal experiences, and some books too I think, but I realize that's probably unfair of me. Most people, including Christians, are so immersed in the materialism of our day, or naturalism or whatever the best term is, they need proof of claims that there is something beyond the physical world. Even saying that, however, I'm thinking that if we are Christians we believe ON FAITH what the Bible teaches. But then I remember that "Doubting Thomas" wanted evidence before he'd believe, and Jesus willingly gave it, so there's the answer to that. But on the other other hand Jesus said that although he showed His wounds to Thomas, it is better if we believe what the witnesses tell us, which Thomas had refused to do. But if some people need more evidence, and it's available, there's nothing wrong with pursuing it. Leave it at that.

Materialist secularists, who have been thoroughly brainwashed against the idea of anything existing beyond this physical universe, can't be expected to understand UFOs, for instance, in any terms other than physical. It's got to be some kind of advanced technology. NDEs and apparitions on the other hand they just attribute to some kind of psychological state of the person experiencing them. About UFOs, however, Jacques Valleee's work should go some distance toward disabusing them of their physicalistic bias, but I suppose they can shrug that off too just because the materialist bias is so solidly entrenched. Vallee isn't even a Christian, or religious at all as far as I know.

But once you've accepted the idea of another world and the spearation of soul from body, I do still think that Christians should have been taught to be alert to the possibility of demonic deception and it's appallling to find out they aren't. So far Miller has only spoken of these scenarios as something God brings about. Maybe by the end of the discussion I'll have a different impression. I can hope I guess. She said without much conviction.

Miller gives the general outline of what he says is a pretty consistent scenario experienced in NDEs. it starts with dying on the operating table, then floating above the scene and watching what's going on, then going somewhere else which is a beautiful landscape, seeing familiar people who had died, often seeing one's own life reviewed, then being told it's not yet their time and they are to return to their body.

Such experiences are had around the world, in many different cultures, and the scenario is pretty much the same although terms and sights are different in occordance with the cultural expectations of the person. Muslims forf instance see "Allah" although even these supposed Christians assume that's the true God they are seeing under a different name, which is simply false. It's the same with Hindus who may see one or another of their multiple gods.
Shouldn't this fact alone alert a Chrsitian that there's something wrong here, that these experiences cannot be coming from God? Even the different clothing that is seen should mean they aren't all visiting the same place. Miller says it seems that they are seeing what "the people on the other side" want them to see, and I'm sure that is very true. The "people on the other side" are putting on a show, a performance, for the purpose of deceiption. This is very similar to what Jacques Vallee concluded about the phenomena that seem so similar to UFOs in their behavior down through history, despite their very different appearance in accordance with the technology and cultural expectations of the time and place. That is, he concluded that they are the work of invisible beings designed to deceive people. They can fabricate NDE landscapes and impersonate familiar people just as they can fabricate vehicles appropriate to a particular time and place, now the UFOs seen today, and an apparition of "Mary" and so on. They are masters of illusion.


McDowell says the most convincing information comes from those who met deceased family members on the other side and bring back information they couldn't have known without that experience, including information about someone who was there who just died but nobody knew it yet. I'm sorry, Sean, this is SO naive of you. Demons impersonate people all the time. That's what "ghosts" are. That's why the Witch of Endor was shocked when the prophet Samuel himself actually appeared to talk to King Saul rather than the impersonation she was expecting. And demons would have information about people that we might not have so they can use it to convince a person he's been to heaven. Please, Church, please please wake up. We can't afford this kind of naivete.

First, what do we see in scripture about heaven? Not pretty landscapes. We are shown the throne room of God and innumerable angels worshipping God. In one story Jesus told we are shown a rich man in Hades suffering from the flames while a poor man he had mistreated during his life was happily embraced in "the bosom of Abraham." There's no pretty landscape shown here for anybody, but sinners are given to expect that they will go to a place of torment. How is it then that unbelievers see the same pleasant scene as believers? Also, Jesus told the thief on the cross beside Him who recognized Him as the Messiah, that he would be in Paradise with Him. Paradise is understood to be the holding place of the souls of the righteous dead, a part of Hades, the other part being where the rich man was tormented. There is simply nothing to lead us to expect to go to a beautfiul peaceful landscape, certainly not unbelievers, and not even believers as far as scripture reveals. "Paradise" MIGHT have such a landscape but the general biblical idea is that we will be among millions of believers, not in a quiet landscape with a few friends and family members, and we wouldn't see unbelieving friends and family members there anyway. According to the Bible they are in the place of torment, so all the unbelievers who have these nice bucolic visions or visits are being deceived, lured into a passive expectation from which they are going to be rudely shocked when they meet the reality, if they don't repent and seek the salvation of Christ.

Surely this is a demonic deception to keep people lulled by wrong ideas about God and the afterlife. People who trust in such experiences are not going to be looking for salvation in Christ, they'll just accept the illusion of a nice place they are going to. Many change their lives, try to be better people after such experiences, but that for an unbeliever is a "salvation by works" idea and is contrary to the biblical doctrine. The fact that people all over the world in many different cultures have similar experiences creates the impression that there is nothing special about the biblical revelation. It's just another religion, while the "reality" they see is that all people go to the same place no matter what they're religion or belief, including atheists, who also have these experiences. Nothing here about one life followed by the Judgment that is taught in the Bible.

Finally, near the end, Miller talks about some NDEs that teach a false theology according to the Bible. He acknowledges that there can be deceptive experiences. But he nevertheless holds onto the idea that the NDE phenomena themselves come from God, so that it must be some aberration in the personality that experiences them rather than in the experience itself. And Sean McDowell seems not to see the majority of them as inconsistent with the Biblical revelation of Heaven. This I don't understgand at all. There is simply nothing in scripture that fits with these peaceful landscapes with a few angels and familiar people around or sometimes even completely unpopulated.

It doesn't seem to occur to either of them that the experiences themselves are fabricated, that it could be the work of demonic beings. That never gets mentioned at all, but it is the most likely explanation of all of it to my mind. The lack of similarity to the biblical accounts, the seeing of family members, the fact that atheists and believers in false religions have similar experiences. Seems to me this ought to alert a Christian that these are simply NOT coming from God.

If the main concern is whether or not such experiences are real, whether the soul can and does leave the body under some circumstances, which does seem to be the main part of their concern, I think these studies and the testimonies themselves do confirm this reality. But when it comes to the experiences of "heaven," it all looks like a monumental deception and I'm appalled if not exactly surprised that Christians fall for it so easily. I get why atheists and believers in other religions fall for it, but not biblically educated Christians.

Demons are calling the shots in these pretty stories, just as they are calling the shots about UFOs, , and poor gullible fallen humanity, and sadly, Christians too, either deny the obvious reality of them or eat up the lies the demons tell about them. Oh my poor aching head.

More "Heaven" Experiences Claptrap. Along with UFOs and False Prophets the Demonic world is Hard at Work In These Last Days,

When I run across something I wasn't looking for, twice in this case, I feel I'm supposed to write about it. That's what happened recentlyh with a couple of stories of Near Deathn Experiences. I watched one, can't even remember the guy's name, he was interviewed twice and i watched both. Threw it out though, just not interested in writing about it. Then this morning I ran across Sean McDowell interviewing someone who has studied NDEs. Only watched a few minutes of it, again not really interested, but then he mentioned the title of one of the books I'd posted about some years ago, Heaven is for Real, and I decided OK, sigh, guess I have to do another post on this.

All I can manage at the moment is a quick overview off the top of my head. If I continue to watch the McDowell interview I may have to come back and make some corrections but I'll try to avoid saying things I'll have to correct.

McDowell is the son of Josh McDowell, well-known Christian apologist whose books were widely read in the nineties. I read them. He's a Christian. So why on earth doesn't he know that
1) Yes NDEs are real supernatural experiences (some are anyuway, some may be frauds)
2) No,they don't come from God; they are demonic manifestations.

That is the impression I get from his opening remarks. If I hear more and he says something different I'll come back and correct this.

One way you can tell they are false, maybe THE way you can tell they are false, is that they have nothing to do with Christ. He may be mentioned but only as a remote figure off somewhere in the background of the scenario. The scenario is usually a pastoral sort of landscape, pretty and peaceful, with beautiful colors, flowers etc. In the case of the book "Heaven is for Real" the boy who had the experience was introduced to a sister he didn't know he had, who had died in the womb before he was born, and to a grandfather he never knew. This kind of experience is very confincing. Well, it's convinding that something supernatural did indeed happen, he really did get information he couldn't otherwise have known.

But these are Christians. They should know better. We are told in scripture that the devil often appears "as an angel of light." He likes to impersonate God Himself after all.

What would be Satan's motive for deceiving people in this way? It's really prettyh clear: it's to get people focused on experience instead of on Christ and scripture. Our faith is to be in Christ, not in our experiences, and those of us who have had supernatural experiences are definitely susceptible to putting our trust in them rather than in Jesus. I've had to fight my own tendency in this direction.

But NDEs are experienced by all kinds of pewople, not just Christians. A Mormon woman wrote a book about hers a couple decades ago that became quite popular. So in that case it confirmed her in her false Mormon beliefs, not something that would comew from God, clearly a demonic delusion.

The first man I mention above clearly puts all his faith that he will be going to heaven when he dies in his NDE experience. It was so real, so amazingly peaceful. When someone asked if he's a Christian he said yes but then he spoke of Jesus as someone he takes as a model, NOT AS THE SAVIOR OF HIS SOUL even though he gave lip service to that idea. Clearly his heart is with the experience, not with Christ.

These experiences are just part of the End Times demonic delusions that have beem proliferating over the last few decades. They include the apparitions of Mary that keep Catholics in thrall when they should be pursuing salvation in Christ; they include the very recent revival of interest in UFOs, now called UAPs, that I've written posts about recently. All these things are stage shows put on by demons to dazzle and deceive human beings and turn us awau from God. The "heaven" stories I wrote about years ago, listed in the right margin here, are also NDEs.

I also recently wrote about a woman "prophet" who has posted a lot of her prophecies, in the form of visions and dreams, She keeps putting up more of them. The few I looked at in any detail are so clearly incompatible with the biblical Christ it's depressing to think that she, with her extensive church experience, can't see through them. But she's only one among many such "prophets" these days. All professing Christians. Jan Markell's latest "Understanding the Times" radio show addresses this phenomenon. Some forty such "prophets" predicted last Fall that Donald Trump was going to win the election. The prophet I mentioned here said the same thing. Only a few of them have apologized for their error, others have tried to rationalize it away.

Such "prophecies" are clearly just another distraction from our need to keep our eyes upon Jesus Himself, especially now when the signs are coming so fast and furious that His return can't be far off. All this stuff comes from the devil. Today's "prophets" are part of the charismatic movement that was pretty soundly debunked by John MacArthur's "Strange Fire" conference some years ago, which I link in the right margin. There is no way the phenomena being experienced by charismatics has anything to do with the "gifts of the Spirit" described in scripture. The conference set me free from some lingering doubts of my own, but unfortunately many in the charismatic movement rejected the message and criticized MacArthur for it.

I'm just tossing this off but I may come back and add some links and make any corrections that seem necessary. I'm doing it this way because when I spend time collecting evidence, links etc., I sometimes just accumulate half-written posts that never make it onto the public blog. That's happened quite a bit recently. I'm still hoping I'll get some of them posted but in any case I wanted to be sure this one did. We're SO close to the Rapture, SO close. I've been yearning more and more to leave this planet which is getting more wicked, perverse, irrational and upside down every day.

IGNORE NDEs. They are demonic deceptions designed to produce a false "faith" that is not of God.
IGNORE APPARITIONS OF "MARY." This is an old demonic delusion by now. May many Catholics wake up.
IGNORE UFOs or UAPs They are not physical, they are not "technology," they are otherworldly beings.
IGNORE THE SO-CALLED "PROPHETS." They are deceived deceivers.