Monday, October 7, 2024

D43cREATION EVOLUTION pOSTS

tHEY ARE SCATTERED THROUGH MY BLOG OVER ABOUT A MONTH NOW AND MOSTLY ARE JUST SKETCHY ACCOUNTS OF MY ARGUMENTS AGAINST EVOLUTION, THREE GEOLOGICAL AND THREE BIOLGOICAL.  tHE MERE FACT OF THE HUGE SLABS OF TABLETOP FLAT SEDIMENTARY ROCK SPANNING WHOLE CONTINENSTS SHOWS THAT THEY CAN'T POSSIBLY REPRESENT TIME PERIIODS OF HUNDRED  NO, SORRY, TENDS OF MILLIONS OF YEARS PER TIME PERIOD.  tHAT'S ONE.  tHE FACT THAT THE STRATA ARE COMPLETELY UNDISTURBED INTHEIR INDIIDUAL EXISTENCE, ONLY THE WHOLE STACK BEING DISTUBRBED AS   AFTER THE WHOLE THING WAS LAID DOWN, PARTS OF IT SCATTERED IN SOME PLACES SUCH AS ACROSS THE eNGLISH iSLAND, AND THE STATE OF tENNESSEE, SOME OF IT TWISTED INTO PRETZELS BUT ALWAYS IN BLOCKS, NEVER IN THE INDIVIDUAL LAYER AND CERTAINLY NOT AT THE TIME OF ITS LAYING DOWN.  tHESE ARE SIMPLY NOT TIME PERIODS.  aND i ALSO DECIDED TO ADD THE FACT THAT THERE ARE BOTH SEA CREATURES AND LAND CREATURES FOSSILZIED TOGETHER IN A SINGLE LAYER HERE AND THERE, WHIC HIS IS IMPOSSIBLE UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS.   sURELY ALL THIS HAS BEEN NOTICED BY SCIENCE BUT NOBODY EVER MENTIONS IT AND IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE IT KILLS THE WHOLE IDEA OF AN ANCIENT EARTH.

tHE BIOLGOCIAL ARGUMENTS START WITH THE ONE i USED AT EVC FORUM FOR YEARS, THE FACT THAT VARIATION OF TRAITS IS ACCOMPANIED BY THE REDUCTION IN GENETIC DIVERSITY, ILLUSTRATED BY DOMESTIC BREEDING FOR STARTERS AND YOU LOSE THE TRAITS FOR OTHER BREEDS AS YOU ARE WORKING TO ESTABLISH  A PARTICULAR BREED.  tHE SAME THING WOULD HAPPEN IN THE WILD IF THERE IS SUCH A PERSISTENT VARIATION WHICH i THINK WOUDL HAPPEN IN RING SPECIES IN PARTICULAR, WHERE A FEW INDIVIDULAS MIGRATE AWAY FROM AN ESTABLISHED POPULATION TO FORM A NEW ONE AND DEVELOP NEW CHARACTGERISTICS FROM  A NEW SET OF GENE FREQUENCIES, LOSING THE TRAITS BEHIND THAT ARE NOT BEING BROUGH T TO THE FORE IN THE NEW POPULATION.   eVENTUALLY YOU'D HAVE TO RUN OUT OF GENETIC VARIABILITY AND THAT IS NO FORMULA FOR EVOLTUION.   tHE NEXT ARGUMENT IS THAT ALL VARIATION OCCURS WITHIN THE GENOME OF A SPECIES, THROUGH SEXUAL RECOMBINATION IN SEXUALLY REPRODUCING SPECIES, VARIATIONS BEING A MATTER OF RANDOM PAIRING IN THE FERTILIZED OVUM.   yOU CAN'T GET NEW TRAITS JUST VARIATIONS ON THE TRAITS THAT BELONG TO THE SPECIES WHICH IS WHAT THE GENOME CODES FOR AND NOTHING ELSE.  eVOLUTIONISTS ACT AS IF VARIATION CAN JUST GO ON AND AON ALTHOGUH THEY SURELY KNOW THE LIMTIS DEFINED BY A GENOME.  jERRY cOYNE ACTUALLY SAID THAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A WOLF AND A CHIHUAHUA IS TO HIS MIDN EVIDENCE OF EVOLTUION WHICH IS JUST GPLANIN RIDICULOUS.  tHE TRAIT VARIATIONS OF BOTH ANIMALS ARE BUILT INTO THE GENOME OF THE DOG.  THEY ARE DOGS THROUGH THE CSHARED GENOME.  GOOD GRIEF THIS IS OBVIOUS.  

tHEN THERE IS THE BODY PLAN WHICH SEEMS TO ME TO BE CONSISTENTLY DEFINITIVE OF A GIVEN SPECIES, RECOGNIZABLE AS THAT SPECIES IN SKELETON FORM, AND NEVER VARYING IN AN WAY THAT HINTS AT ITS EVER BECOMING SOME OTHER SPECIES.  a DOG BOY PLAN I ALWAYS A DOG PBODY PLAN, ERECOGNIZABLE IN WOLF OR CHIHUAHUA OR GREAT dANE OR lABRADOR ETC.    a CAT SKELETON IS ALWAYS A CAT SKELETON WHICH OF TIGER OR HOUSECAT OR BOGBCAT OR MOUNTAIN LION.   eTC.  a BIRD IS A BIRD IS A BIRD WHIETHER IT'S A PENGUIN OR A HAWK OR AN OSTRICH OR A CHICKADEE, IT IS ASSEMBLED IN THE SAME PROPORTIONS WITH THE SAME POSITION OF APPENDAGES IN EVERY BIRD.     tHE BODY PLAN OF A CHIMPANZEE IS NO AT ALL THE SAME AS THE BODFY PLAN OF A HUMAN BEING, PROPORTIONS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.  tHE KIND AND AMOUNT OF CHANGE TO GET FROM ONE TO THE OTHER IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE.

nO TIME WON'T DO IT, YOU NEED A CHECHANISM FOR SUCH CHANGE AND THERE ISN'T WONE.  yOU NEED IT WHETHER YOU HAVE TEN YEARS OR TEN MILLION FOR THE CHANGE.

No comments: