I called it an apparition, the ghost as it were of a human being I'd seen earlier that day on the street who had threatened me. It was threatening me now in its demonic form, the man I'd seen apparently having been demon possessed and the demon appearing in my room that night.
this happened almost forty years ago and I was telling it to give an example of some experiences I've had theat lead me to believe in the Bible as a supernatural wsork, supernatural experiences being some evidence of that to my mind.
did I kn hat such things can be neurologically created he wanted to know. Well sure, that sort of explanation accompanies every discussion of the supernatural with unbelievers. We always get the physical version of it in response. So sure I know that but this was an apparition.
How do I know that. Well I don't know I can't prove it I simply know it the way I know a dream from reality or something like that. yeah I guess I could be wrong but no this was a real apparition it was not a neurological event.
I should be open minded he said.
after forty years of knowing this is an papparition I should be open minded and recondsider that I decided forty years ago is not a neurologial event? Obviously being open minded in rthis case simply means giving up the idea that it was an apprition and believe it was a neyurological event. that's the only answer that will be accepted.
So there is no point in sdiscusing such thigns once you know that the conclusion is determined already. T
There is no more evidence for the one than the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment