lIST OF eVIDENCES aGAINST EVOLUTION

 lIST OF EVIDENCES AGAINST EVOLUTION:

THERE IS NO FOSSIL RECORD BECUASE THE STRATA IN WHICH THEY ARE FOUND CANNOT POSIBLY BE TIME PERIODS.BECAUSE OF THE PHYSICAL SITUATION ALONE.   THEY COULD NOT POSSIB LY EXIST ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH OR AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA AS THE TABLETOP FLAT HORIZONTAL LAYERS OF SEDIMENTS THEY ARE THAT STRETCH FOR THOUSANDS OF SQUARE MILES.

THE FOSSIL RECORD CANNOT EXIST BECAUSE THOSE TSTRATA IN WHICH THEY ARE EMBEDDED SHOW NO SIGNS OF THE DISTURBANCES WITHIN THEM THAT SHOULD BE EXPECTEDED OF ANY SEDIMENTARY LAYER THAT EXISTED ON THE EARTH FORE EVEN A THOUSAND YEARS LET ALONE THE TEND OF MILLIONS ATTRIBUTED TO THEM.

iN THE SO CALLED FOSSIL RECORD ITSELF THERE ARE BOTH EAC  SEA CREATURES AND LAND CRATURES FOUND TOGETHER IN THE SAME SEDIMENTARY LAYER.   THAT COULDN'T HAPPEN IF THE FOSSILS WERE CREATURES THAT DIED AND WERE BURIED IN THE SEDIMENT.  EITHER THE SEDIMENT WS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA OR IT WAS A LAYER OF THE SURFACE OF THE LAND.  yOU WOULDN'T GET LAND ANIMALS IN THE FORMER, NOR FISH IN THE LATTER.

tHE FOSSIL RECORD CAN'T BE EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION BECAUSE IF IT WERE IT WOULD SHOW EVERY CREATURE SHOWING UP IN EVERY LAYER ABOVE THE FIRST ONE IT APPEARED IN , IN EVEN GREATRER NUMBERS SINCE THEY ALL PERSIST INTO THE PRESENT.  oR AT LEAST THOSE WHO ICH DO PERSIST INTO THE PRESENT WULD SHOW UP IN ALL THE LAYERS, AT LEAST ALL THE SEA CREATURES IN THE SEA LAYERS AND THE LAND CREATURES IN THE LAND LAYERS.   tHEY EXPLAIN THIS AWAY WITH THEIR NOTIONS THAT THERE WERE ALL THESE EXTINCTION EVENTS.   tHAT'S REALLY PRETTY FUNNY.    bUT STILL THERE SHOULD BE ZILLIONS OF SIH IN ALL THE SEA LAYERS AND THERE AREN'T.  aND CROCODILES GALOERE PLUS LIZARDS AND IQUANAS WITH THE MANNMMALS.  ETC.

THAT'S JUST THE GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.  tHE BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE STARTS WITH THE OBSERVATION THAT THE GENOME OF EACH SPECIES IS THE SOURCE OF ALL THE VARIATIONS IIN THAT SPECIES, AND THERE IS NO WAY THAT HAS EVERY EVER MBEEN DEMONSTRATED TO TURN THE GENOME OF ONE SPECIES INTO ANOTHER.

aNOTHER EVIDENCE IS THAT AS NEW VARIATIONS ARE DEVELOPED, NEW PHENOTYPES FOR NEW POPULATIONS, THERE HAD TO BE A REDUCTIONIN GENETIC DIVERSITY AS THE PHENOTYPES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE NEW POPULATION GET ELIMINATED FROM THE POPULATION.  tHIS IS DEMONSTRATED CLEARLY IN DOMESTIC BREEDS WHERE TOEO GET A PARTICULAR BREED REQUIRES LOSING THE TRAITS FOR DIFFERENT BREEDS.   aND EVENTUALLY WHAT IS CONSIDERED TO BE A PURE BREED WOULD HAVE MANY HOMOZYGOUS GENES FOR ITS ASALIENT TRAITS, HAVING LOST THE ALLELES FOR THE OTHER TRAITS.

kEN hAM TALKS ABOUT THE FACT THAT EACH SPECIES IS CAPABLE FO ENORMOUS VARIATIONS.  

i THINK i ASHOULD LSO POINT OUT THAT ALONG WITH THE BAZILLIONS OF FISH THAT SHOULD PERSIST THROUGH ALL THE LAYERS IN WHICH ITS SUPPOSED EVOLVED DESCENDANTS ARE FOUND SHOULD  INCLUDE THE VERY FIRST TYPES FOUND.   

aND ALL THE CREATURES FOUND IN THE SO CALLED cAMBRIAN EXPLOSION TOO.  ARE THEY ALL CONFINED TO THAT LAYER?  bAD FOR EVOLUTION IF SO.