If You Have ANY ALLERGIES You Are At Risk From the COVID Vaccines.

 Friend went to a doctor about a rash who wanted to test her for allergies, asked for her history of allergic reactions and she mentioned an incident of anaphylactic shock from insect bites, to which he responded that she should not take the COVID vaccine!  Further discussion brought out the information that it isn't just allergies to the ingredients in the vaccine that's a reason not to take it, but allergies to anything at all.  Not that you'll necessarily die or have a severe reaction but you might with that particular medical history.

Look, take Quercetin and Zinc and Vitamin C or if you can get someone to prescribe it and a pharmacy to fill the prescription get HCQ and Zinc and an antibiotic, take either protocol prophylactically and increase the dose if you get COVID symptoms.  I put up the Zelenko protocol for these things in other posts but I'll try to get back and repost it here.

Dismantling America 3: Western Civilization and Its "White" Classical Music Must GO

Stumbling around in You Tube, watching this and that, some animal rescue videos for intance, which I sometimes watch to rescue ME, from the effects of our hideous political situation.  Hope for Paws in Los Angeles always has feel-good stories about some poor miserable animal that was abandoned and living in sad circumstances that they rescue into a happy life with people who love them.   Gives me some kind of strength to go on to the next assault from the current insanity.  

Tonight, well by now this morning, I heard some of Todd Friel's Wretched Radio which is usually about the state of Christianity in America, sometimes as sad as the political mess.  I stumbled on one where he is discussing Critical Race Theory, which is a major element in the political insanity that can make me have to flee to something uplifting as an antidote, but he provided the antidote himself in this one.  

Critical Race Theory is one of the academic assaults on all reason that comes out of Cultural Marxism and took over the universities particularly since the Sixties.  Critical Theory itself is Marxist but Critical Race Theory is the idea that everythinjg in American life can be reduced to systemic racism and the white race is evil.  Everything the white race has ever done is evil and that means everything, all the great thinkers of Western Civilization are evil, all the great artists, all the scientists, the works.   I think that pretty much sums it up, sorry if I'm missing anything.  But you can go hear Todd Friel's account of it anyway at the link I'm posting below this.

  His theme is how this CRT is ruining our culture as well as getting into the churches, but ruining the culture for sure.   He'd done his own stumbling around on You Tube and came across a young black man reacting to hearing opera music for the first time, specifically Luciano Pavarotti singing Nessun Dorma, from Puccini's opera Turandot, and he plays an excerpt from it.   You understand of course that Puccin was one of those evil white men who wrote his operas only for the purpose of expressing his white supremacy and oppressing black people, and Pavarotti was another evil white man singing with the same purpose.  

This is ruining our country, and it will ruin your church | WRETCHED RADIO - YouTube

The young man's reacton is very touching, like hearing angels he said, heavenly he said.  Friel is angry that this idiotic racist "theory" wants to deprive him of such an experience.  I managed to find the video Friel played, so you can hear the whole thing:

FIRST TIME HEARING Luciano Pavarotti sings "Nessun dorma" REACTION (IM SHOOK !!!) - Bing video

Where's the racism?  The young man isn't feeling oppressed by a systemically racist culture, he's encountering the human soul of Puccini;s music and the human soul of Pavarotti's singling as it touches his own human soul.   Art transcends such soulshrinking stuff as racism and racist theory.   

So I went and found many other videos of young blacks reacting for the first time to this music, all of it touching and illuminating.  I gather this is a trend on You Tube, videos about people's first-time reactions to all sorts of music and maybe other things, I've only watched some of the reactions to this particular Pavarotti performance.  Very much an antidote for me to the idiotic instane Criticial Race Theory.  All that Marxist stuff that's overtaking the country and the world kills humanity in a million ways.  Bible prophecy has it ruling the world pretty soon I think, but it's SO nice to see how some humanity can still find its way through its wall of hatred and death.  

Here are a few more of those reaction videos, and there are many more at You Tube.

Black Reactors listening to Pavarotti's Nessun Dorma for the first time. original video by GGT - YouTube

FIRST TIME HEARING LUCIANO PAVAROTTI NESSUN DORMA REACTION - YouTube

LUCIANO PAVAROTTI CARUSO REACTION - YouTube

I also grew up in a culturally deprived family, this isn't unique to blacks.  Working class, popular music all I ever heard, but I did have an aunt who was, you might say, sort of "arty" -- I had ten aunts and five uncles betwen both sides of the family and she was the only one who marchedto  a different drummer.  When I was about ten she sent me a 45 RPM recording made for children, of Haydn's Clock Symphony with the Surprise Symphony on the other side.  I was utterly enraptured by the sound of classical music, the sound of the orchestra, and I played it over and over and over.  It was the only classical music I heard until I moved to a big city high school at fifteen and my best friend came from a culturally educated family, played the cello and took me to hear her in an orchestra rehearsal, which also enraptured me.   I loved being surrounded by such wonderful sounds, the blending of all those instruments..

So what do the Critical Race Theory people want to do, confine us to rap music and hip hop?  

Dismantling America continued

 It seems quaint even to ask the question, whatever happened to "I hate your opinion but i'll fight to the death for your right to say it" or however that goes?  It's gone gone gone.  We are in the Age of Censorship.  No more freedom of speech if you don't share the views of the ruling party

.  I was trying to find Mike Lindell's documentary about the election.  I kind of knew I wouldn't be able to and I couldn't.  There are dozens of copies of it at You Tube but all have been disabled so you can't hear them or even get them to run at all.  I came on the scene too late I suppose, some did get to see it a while back but now it's been successfully censored.  Censored with a vengeance.  Someone posts the film and it gets immediately disabled.  

Sometimes they put up a warning message alleging unsavory content of some sort.  Lindell on an interview I saw showed one allegation of sexual scenes in his documentary as an excuse for banning it.  I remember seeing a similar warning on something I wanted to watch a while back that alleged "emotionally disturbting" content.  I'd already seen it once so I knew there was nothing emotionally disturbing in it.  Except maybe to liberals who are disturbed by conservative opinions ("Illegal immigration, high taxes and the minimum wage all deprive American workers of jobs."  Or "Poverty is not caused by other people being rich."  Or "There will probably always be individual racists in the world but there is no longer systemic racism in America."    Boo!"    And they all fall down clutchinjg their throats.)   

This is all going somewhere you know.  They have to control what the pulblic thinks in order to pull off their totalitarian control of all of us.  They'll put the dissenters in reeducation camps and continue to shut up opinions that contradict the party line wherever they appear to be a threat to the ruling class, until eventually they own and control it all.   The Liberal Elites, eventually the Global Elites who will dispense with the Liberal Elites as so many Useful Idiots.  

They must be happy with all the COVID deaths considering that there has always been a simple way of preventing them that has been politically suppressed for a year now.  

Somehow they got themselves convinced that it is a righteous thing to censor your opponent's political views.  Against centuries of American affirmation of freedom.  A twist of a word here, a diabolical interpretation there, a baldfaced lie when necessary.  

Dismantling America by all means necessary

 Some on the Left are actually saying out loud that they think those who supported Trump need to be "reeducated" in camps for that purpose.  We're "cultists" according ot them, who need to be deprogrammed.    That's how brainwashed THEY are, WE are the ones still capable of thinking, but they've got the power these days and that's what counts in the end, isn't it?.

We've heard such things for years of course, but it seems to be more out in the open now.  This is the theme of Chris Pinto's radio show on the 13th and he puts up audio quotes to prove it.  I hate to think how many liberals I even count as friends might think such reedeucation would be a good thing for me.   toward the end of the show Pinto talks about the threat to the second amendment.

  NOTR - RE-EDUCATION CAMP RHETORIC ON THE RISE - 2.13.21 - Show Downloads - Noise of Thunder Radio with Chris Pinto

Earlier I happened to hear about Johns Hopkins University's plan to remove a huge slab of rock wall on which is engraved the First Amerdment to the Constitution.  You know, free speech, free press.  They just bought this museum property and are redesigning it without that message.  One could get all suspicious about this and think they consciously want to rid the university of such an opinion as the right to free speech, but at least one does wonder if anyone stood up for keeping it at least as a local landmark.  I only looked at the article in the Washington Post and didn't see that mentioned.  Anyway, even if nobody is consciously censoring the Constitution I can't help noting that it's a sign of the times anyway, as conservatives and others are being silenced by the tyrannical left on social media, and now they want to "reedeucate" us to conform to THEIR opinions.   This idea of reeducation is such a timeworn well known Communist tactic I have to assume they know that too and it doesn't bother them that they are on the side of America's enemies.

Pope Francis and the Apparitions of "Mary" as the End Times Close In On Us.

Jan Markell's Understanding the Times Radio for last Friday is about deceptions that are coming through the Roman Church, the role of  the Pope in the end times, and deeceptions such as the apparitions of "Mary" that have been occurting frequently around the world and succeeding at seducing people from many religions, including Protestants.  

Jan's guest is ex-Catholic Mike Gendrom who has worked for years to show the deceptions of the RC Church and turn Catholics to the truth of Christ.  . He thinks the Pope could be the False Prophet of the ook of Revelation, rather than the Antichrist which is the role I think he'll play.   The Reformers' identification of the Pope as Antichrist has been dismissed in our time, but some will propose that he could play the role of the False Prophet.

Pope Francis: The Vicar of the New World Order – Mike Gendron - YouTube

I continue to think the Pope is the Anitchrist nevertheless.  The Reformers thought so and gave scriptural reasons for it.  And not only the Reformers but many Christian leaders that preceded them made the same identification, some of whom I took from a teaching by Chris Pinto and posted on this blog some time ago.  The argument against this identification today is that Paul was not talking about a system, such as the papacy, but about a single man.  Considering that there were so many down the centuries  who held that the Pope is Antichrist this argument seems rather thin and arrogant, as if so many would have ignored such a distinction.  

Nevertheless even many people can be wrong.  But the thinking does hold together scripturally.  That is,   the Roman Church itself was certainly a Great Apostasy, or falling-away from the faith with its accumulation of pagan superstitions and doctrine of salvation by faith plus works, rather than faith alone in Christ alone which precludes any of our own works as presumptuous.  

2 Thessalonians 2:3-4  Let no man deceive you by any means, for that day shall not come except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition.  Who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he as God sits in the temple of God,, showing himself that he is God.

Paul was reassuring the Thessalonians that the Day of the LORD had not yet come, that before that could happen this great falling away had to come and that man of sin be reevealed.  Today this is interpreted as all related to the last of the last days, the great falling away beintg what we are seeing now in the growing apostacies of so many churches.    The Antichirst, or "man of sin" is understood to be yet furture, and to be revealed after the Church has been Raptured.

I don't know how much of my view is my own and how much I got from Chris Pinto and Richard Bennett -- I know it was inspired by them and it may be all theirs, I don't know, but it all goes back to the Reformers who understood the falling away or what is now called The Great Apostasy, to be the doctrine of the Roman Church, and the man of sin to be the Pope,  and therefore since both have now been revealed the Day of the LORD could have come any time afterward.  The falling away we are seeing today is probably best understood as the last days spreading of the original Roman apostasy.   

But the Antichrist has already been revealed according to the Reformers.   We don't need to wait for his revelation.  

The reason I think it's probably Francis despite his old age which in itself seems to eliminate him as candidate for that role, is that he's the first Jesuit Pope and that some pretty strange supernatural signs attended his election, which I posted on quite some time ago.     If he is the Antichrist then that makes the end times finale very very close.  We've felt its closeness for years but if a man in his eightties is to play that major role in the Great Tribulation it must be very close indeed.

Well, my opinion jabout this could certainly be wrong, I just think it hangs together better than the popular idea of an unknown political figure suddenly rising to world prominence, a younger man, more of a Hitler type.   As for the Pope's being the False Prophet instead, I just thiknk the arguments for his being the Antichrist overshadow that possibility, both the testimony of the Refomers and their predecessors but also the meaning of the "666" which is so satisfyingly expressed in the term "Vicarivs Filii Dei" which is a title of the Pope that in itself makes him the Antichrist, plus the Roman Numewerals that title adds up to.  It's just too perflect.  No other candidate for that number is so peculiarly apt.  

So some even more satisfying way of identifying these things would ahve to come along to dissuade me of this interpretatiohnn.  

Jan Markell's radio show with mike gendron did, however, highlight a film about the many apparitions of "Mary" that have been seducing not only huge numbers of Catholics but also members of other religions including Protestants.  I think I recall that it was Alexander Hislop, who wrote "The Two Babylons" who suggested that the "Beast" of the Book of Revelation could be the Catholic "Virgin Mary."  That's a rather startling idea but given the increasing frequency of these apparitions at a time when the Last Days Finale feels so close it would make sense to expect "her" to have a prominent role in the Great Tribulationj.   just as does the Antichrist, "she" usurps the role of Christ.  She doesn't quite yet fully displace Him but that's obviously just a fiction being maintained for the sake of those who still hold to some remnant of faith in Christ.

I don't know where to fit "her" in yet.  

UPDATE:  If it weren't for the references to the Antichrist that pretty clearly identify him as a man, and human, and some other clues that don't fit, it could even make sense to consider the apparitions of "Mary" to be the Antichrist.  "She" certainly displaces Christ in the hearts of many, does usurp many of His attributes, claims to bring salvation and so on.  As Mike Gendron points out in the radio show "she" is also venerated by Muslims who have also been attending sites of these appearances, and he thinks "she" (yes I have to keep it in quotes because these are demonic appearances, not Mary herself) anyway, "she" may be the means of bringing Catholicism and Islam together for the final World Religion.  This suggests that "she" could very well be the Beast that will be worshipped by all still living on the earth after the true Church is gone and that makes her the Antichrist.  Strange idea of course.   But these appartitions are real supernatural phenomena and that is very seductive in  itself.  This is possibly the only thing that to my mind twould put the Pope in the role of False Prophet.   

Although the idea is intriguing I can't really think it holds together in the end.  Perhaps there is some other way to include "her" in the end times scenario that fits better.  I don't think she represents the woman who rides the beast though, because that is so clearly the Harlot Church of Rome.  Oh well, it will make sense whatever it is when it finally does all come together in reality.   /update

Anyway here's the film about the recent apparitions:  Messages From Heaven - "Virgin Mary" or Deception? (Full documentary uploaded with permission) - YouTube

Bad Science, Bad Journalism Used to Argue Against Concerns about the Safety of the Vaccines

Here's the video about vaccine deaths in Israel that I linked in my previous post about HCQ, after which it was taken down from You Tube for "violating [their] terms of service," by which of course they mean violating their politics.   

Fortunately these days we do have some other options for presering such censored information, such as, in the case of videos, Rumble or Bitchute.  I've only recently become aware of hem, but I found out immediately that they are dismissed by liberals as "right wing conspiracy" bastions, at least Rumble is, and I encountered that attitude toward Parler some time ago.  It's not that the sites are aimed at conservatives, just that conservatives go there because they are getting banned on the familiar social media.   Ah well, at least some censored material is available.   So this one was reposted both at Rumble and Bitchute.  Since a liberal friend treated it as "disinformation" because it was on Rumble (sigh) I'm glad to know it's also on Bitchute, although for all I know that will be dismissed in the same way.  ANYWAY, here it is on Bitchute.

Many Dying in Israel Following the Experimental Pfizer COVID mRNA Injections (bitchute.com)

This is an Israeli Christian man presenting a radio news broadcast in Israel on which the news announcer, Mordechai Sones,  reads a list of people who died soon after getting the Pfizer vaccine.  He reports names, ages, and whatever is known about their medical condition when they got the vaccine, and the circumstances of their death afterward.   The idea is to warn people that the vaccine can be dangerous for some people despite the general hyping of it by the government.

 Although the information is pretty straightforward, just a list of facts, as I say above it can be dismissed by a liberal mindset for being on a "rightwing" platform or for other reasons.  The host of the video comments after playing the radio broadcast that Bill Gates who is a major promoter of the vaccines, has said he thinks the world population needs to be drastically decreased, and this has led to suspicion about the safety of the vaccines he's promoting.  Which the video host mentions.  And that of course is a "conspiracy theory" which somehow becomes a reason to dismiss what the radio announcer said although there is no connection between the two.  (sigh).   Gates certainly isn't going to be advocating something he knows to be lethal (I assume) but he does manage to say things that make people nervous.  Anyway, again, it's irrelevant to the content of the radio broadcast.

The main argument against it is that somehow people who connect the deaths to the vaccine have failed to take into account that the people would have died anyway.. I was sent an article in response to the video that insists that is the case. 

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/how-conspiracy-theories-undermine-peoples-trust-in-covid-19-vaccines    How Conspiracy Theories Undermine People’s Trust in COVID-19 Vaccines 

The article is presented as if it's a reasoned  discussion of objections to the vaccine, but it's the usual leftist hit piece that attacks persons rather than the argument, and then when it finally gets around to offering some evidence it's addressed to a complete misrepresenation of the objection.  This is propaganda and it's distressing that many treat it as objective.

Vaccine-hesitant groups are exploiting the deaths of people who died of old age or underlying health conditions after receiving the COVID-19 shot to undermine trust in the vaccines. WesScientists say some deaths will occur during the COVID-19 vaccination rollout, but these deaths would have happened for other reasons and are unrelated to the vaccine.

 What does "vaccine-hesitant" mean?   A personality disorder?  A genetic disease?  What if it's an evolutionary adaptation that would benefit the "species" if  the less fit types don't wipe them out? (Yeah I know that by definition they can't be evolutionarily superior if they could be wiped out, but the fact is that it could happen and the ToE  just gets things wrong all the time.)   But I'm being silly.  Sort of.  The point is why are they talking about people at all, either groups or individuals?   

A credible approach would be to address the facts presented as evidence against the safety of the vaccine, not the people raising the doubts.. The whole thrust of this piece is to smear those who believe the vaccines can be dangerous, but in reality they believe this not because they are somehow defective personalities but because of the evidence as they perceive it.  If they are wrong it's because sometimes people get thigs wrong, including scientists, so deal with their evidence.  This kind of writing is nothing but character assassination, a kind of "journalism" that used to be condemned, but it seems to be standard practice these days in the service of a particular ideology.

And it goes on to tell us that these obviously defective "vaccine-hesitant" human beings have scurrilous motivations, as they are exploiting the deaths of people who died of old age or underlying health conditions after receiving the COVID-19 shot to undermine trust in the vaccines

Wow.   "Exploiting?"  Wow.  And exploiting with the intention of "undermine trust" as if they just have some predetermined need to exploit and undermine trust.  What sleazy "reporting."  I wonder how long it took to select the terms with which to construct this picture of obviously horrible people.   

Eventually some evidence is offered:

...latching onto reports of real deaths following the shot, blaming the vaccine and disregarding medical information that other causes are to blame...

“Older people in nursing homes are being prioritized for the vaccine [and] that’s a group of people who are dying at a higher rate already.”

Ignoring that important context is a strategy ...  

"...[people] should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility.” [Moore said]

But there was more to Moore’s statement that the meme left out, Reuters reported. She went on to say, “That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes.”

The additional context clarifies that Moore is saying deaths in nursing homes that have nothing to do with the vaccine should be expected. 

Is this convincing?  For starters, why would people who distrust the vaccine be employing a "strategy" to discredit it?  It's a very strange idea that people just have this irrational need to fnd fault rather than that they honestly believe there is reason to consider the vaccines dangerous.  Instead of smearing the people who have such concerns, shouldn't the aim of such an article be simply to prove them wrong with real information?  The fact that elderly people die in greater numbers than others anyway is not exactly evidence.  Where are the statistics showing that they normally die at the same rate they are dying after being vaccinated.  OK, so they go on to offer some statistical support: 

According to [The COVID-19 Vaccine Communication Handbook],, “if we vaccinate 10 million people and the vaccine had no side effects whatsoever, then over the following two months we can nonetheless expect that 4,025 of those vaccinated will have a heart attack, 3,975 will have a stroke, 9,500 will have a new diagnosis of cancer, and 14,000 will, unfortunately, die.”

“The key is that statistically bad things will happen to a small percentage of people after vaccination even if the vaccines are perfectly safe,” Dr. Robert Wachter, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told Healthline in an email.

Yeah, plausible enough in the abstract but you still have to show that this is in fact what is going on.  We need the number of deaths that have occurred after taking the vaccine to compare with these averages.  Are the numbers the same or not?   There is a dearth of examples of the thinking of the so-called "vaccine-hesitant" people in this article, all we get is these claims that they are attributing deaths to the vaccine that would have occurred anyway.  Lots of innuendo, no actual evidence.

Perhaps the video I posted above is unusual among the "vaccine-hesitant" but the radio announcer gives quite a bit of specific information where it's available.   I went back and counted:  28 deaths were listed and he stopped because he didn't have time to include more.  For some of them he says only that the person died "after receiving" the vaccine, giving no time frame, but for 16 of them he says how soon they died, and most died within days, a couple a week, one a few weeks, two "immediately after."  Most were elderly but there were a few in their forites, and two in their twenties.  Underlying conditions were mentioned in a few cases, but many were described as completely healthy before getting the vaccine.   While it's possible a few of the deaths were unrelated to the vaccine, it's highly unlikely given the facts that any more than that were coincidental.  The circumstances point to the vaccine as the cause.

The article was sesnt to me as an answer to the video's associatio of the deaths with the vaccine.  It should be quite clear that the people on the list did not die of old age but of the vaccine.  For one thing the deaths occurred very close to the time the shot was given, so the two months range of the article's statistics is not applicable.   And if you're talking about the normal frequency of deaths in elderly people -- or those with underlying conditions -- they don't just up and die all of a sudden as these people did.  The statistics are irrelevant.  This is just propaganda based on plausibe-sounding insinuations, not science despite the usual invocation of science as what makes their thinking superior and trustworthy.  No, it's all just "narrative" buttressed by word salad sprinkled with denigrating words for the doubters and references to credentials and "experts" and sciencey terms for the good guys in the story.   It's a shoddy piece of propaganda that should never have been published, and wouldn't have been in saner times.

I think this quote from  Robert F. Kennedy, a "vaccine-hesitant " "activist" nails it:  

“Coincidence is turning out to be quite lethal to COVID vaccine recipients,”

They actually called this an "emotional" argument.  No, it's just a very funny way of saying how shoddy their reasoning is.

The reasoning is as bad as those many studies of hydroxychloroquine I've mentioned.   They did the studies on hospitalized patients who are normally too sick to benefit from HCQ plus zinc; in some cases they administered the HCQ without the zinc which is useless since it's the zinc that kills the virus while the HCQ is the means of its delivery;   they also failed to distinquish between the low-risk patients who would have recovered without any treatment and the high-risk patients who die in the greatest numbers, and would certainly die even if given HCQ and zinc, because it was given too late to benefit them.  Science has been takinjg a beatinjg lately, in these ridiculous studies and in this ridiculous article that's supposed to prove the vaccines are safe and objectors are idiots.  Politics seems to kill off IQ points.

It's been hard to write this post because I kept wantinjg to answer the endless errors in the article.  Choosing a few to make the point was quite a chore.  I hope I succeeded and didn't leave out anything essential.  

BACK TO HCQ. The Love of Money is the Root of All Evil // The Fear of Man Bringeth a Snare

UPDATE 3.     Keep finding things on Zelenko's website I want to post.   Here's a whole page with some links on it:    Dr. Zelenko Telemedicine Consultation - Stand Out Global

There's a short video there, less than two minutes, where he discusses the vaccine and concludes that nobody needs it.  If you are low risk you don't need it because you'll recover anyway, and if you're high risk you can take the HCQ protocol prophylactically or when symptoms first appear and do well.   If you get the virus you'll develop antibodies and be protected that way. 

And remember, the ionophore-plus-zinc treatments work with any version of the virus, all its mutant versions, whereas the vaccines only work with a specific virus.

There's also a video, about eight minutes, of his discussion with  a pharmacist who refused to fill his presription for HCQ, which shows that the political suppression is going strong.

UPDATE 2:   Here is a very inspiring interview with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who was the first to develop the HCQ treatment.  He goes into his own personal experiences over the last year dealing with cancer,  and how he learned about the HCQ plus zinc treatment, then the political suppression of his treatment and the political attacks on him personally.  He describes how the treatment works.        01/28/2021: Dr. Zelenko: Interview with Peter Breggin (bitchute.com)

He answers a question in this interview that I've had for some time, which is how Trump got COVID if he was taking HCQ as we know he did for a while. Zelenko says he took it for two weeks and then stopped, he doesn't knjow why.   So its efficacy as a prophylactic is not called into question after all.  I still have the question why he didn't resume taking it when he first got symptoms.

He had a personal experience of losing his frear of man during his bout with cancer so here's the scripture basis for that:

Proverbs 29:25  The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in the LORD shall be safe.

Main point to keep in mind about the medical situation:  Zelenko's protocol is not the only effective treatment, which he mentions in the interview, although since it works so well I'm happy staying with it, but he emphasizes that the main thing is EARLY TREATMENT WITH HIGH-RISK PATIENTS.  It has to be early and there's no point in treatintg low-risk patients because they recover on their own. 

UPDATE 1:  Was sent this video about people in Israel dying after receiving either the first or second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.   Many Dying In Israel after Receiving Vaccine: - YouTube

=========================================

I'm still a big fan of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID at the first apearance of symtoms.  Although we now have many new options as well HCQ continues to occupy its own special niche, the best option of them all if it can be used at the right time.   There are better treatments now for the later stages of the disease, and there are now vaccines of course.   But if you're lucky enough to catch the symptoms at their earliest appearance, HCQ is still the remedy of choice.  It prevents the development of the more dangerous phase of the virus, can knowck it out within the first week without hospitalization.   

Ivermectin is another drug with a good record, and quercetin works the same way HCQ does, only not quite as effectively.    I've got Quercetin and Zinc on hand and take it from timje to time but not regularly.  HCQ and Quercetin are ionophores and zinc is an ion.  It's Zinc that kills the virus in the cells but it needs an ionophore to open the cell for it to get in and do its work.  (I don't see why it wouldn't work just as well on one version of the virus as another mutated version too since it  doesn'[t like viruses, period.)    HCQ works best for that purpose.  None of this has changed.  I still think HCQ the treatment of choice if it's available at the right time and I still think it would have saved most of those who have died if it hadn't been politically suppressed.   You can read all about it at 

The Zelenko Protocol:  The Zelenko protocol (utrgv.edu)

=================================

Of course we now have the vaccines as well.  I know lots of people who have had it without problems but I also know of a large number of cases of bad reactions and even death, besides which it's still not completely clear how effecrive they are either in keeping you from getting the virus or keeping you from spreading it.  I'm not ready to have an opinion about it except to say I'm wary of it.   And I'm still convinced that the best way to go is HCQ at the first appearance of symptoms.   Oh and it's also good to do what you can to boost your immune system.  Vitamin C, Vitamin D in particular, the best form of D being sunlight.   Wear a mask when appropriate.   We all know when it's appropriate even if the politicians don't.  (Or I'd like to think so, but people out walking or biking in the open air without other people around don't need it.  Do I have to say this?)_