Friday, February 5, 2021

Yeah, well that moratorium on politics lasted about, what? eight hours or so. Sigh So what is it REALLY all about: The hiddenest conspiracy of them all.

I try to keep up my courage in the face of the constant threat of censorship and other forms of silencing of people with my mental bent, but I have to admit it's getting pretty scary.  And of course it's pooh-poohed by lots of people I talk to so one does end up alone with these things.   There are some topics that at first seem best kept under wraps, but then I end up deciding that's really the path of cowardice so I write about them anyway.   Oh there are lots of "controversial" ones these days, the whole litany of political correctness taboos being a fairly comprehensive  list of land mines you can step on with the most innocent comments.  Now we can't talk about the very great possibility of election fraud, oh no no no, the idea is "baseless" according to all the media accounts that should be neutral but of course aren't.   I'm always surprised when liberal friends and acquaintances don't immediately agree that such censorship is anti-American but I guess I'm just naive that way.  Over and over I expect a sane voice to agree with me and none does.  I HAVE found some sane liberal voices online though and I'm happy about that, but they aren't my own personal acquaintances.  

Oh well , I'm in such an isolated Blogger backwater these days I don't threaten anyone anyway, and that fact does at least permit me to say whatever I want, even if I do have to hold my breath to say it.  On Facebook or Twitter I couldn't get away with saying some things I say here.   I do hold my breath every time I write a "constroversial" post though.   And here comes another one.

Chris Pinto.  He's got his own website, he's not dependent on Big Tech to the extent I am.  Probably more than I know however.  The servers themselves are owned by the forces of darkness these days.  They pulled them out from under Parler after all.    We've all got to toe the Leftist line or else.  That's the rules.  Whaever they call "misinformation" has to be silenced among other things.  

So today's Noise of Thunder radio is about how today's American politics are a version of the 1605 Gunpowder Plot to blow up the British Parliament and kill King James 1.   It was engineered by Jesuits who are dedicated to destroying Protestant nations wherever they exist, and Pinto says he thinks that's the case with the ousting of Trump and the installation of Biden.   He ticked off a long list of Jesuit-influenced people in the Trump administration who have been working against him from the beginning, also his own appointees to the Supreme Court among other things.  Of al the conspiracies that we can identify these days this one is the most unsuspected, the most hidden and yet very likely at the very root of them all.   Most Christians don't have a clue about these things and someone like Trump would be easily deceived by them.   Certainly this one gets a lot of eye-rolling and energetic pooh-poohing, especially by secularists who blindly assume all religions are pretty much the same.

Ah well.  He makes a good case that we just experienced our own Gunpowder Plot or Guy Fawkes Day.  He goes into the ecumenical position of Rome in embracing all religions and how bringing Muslims into the West is their doing.  All this of course fits with my argument that a Pope, mostly likely Francis himself though the time is getting short, is to be the final Antichrist of the Great Tribulation period.  Also known as the Day of the LORD.  

See, what the unbelieving world doesn't know and has to treat as false is that historiy is all about God's plan of redemption  through Jesus Christ AND about His plan to punish Satan and his followers, which is what the Day of the LORD is all about.  You do't want to be on Satan's side and go through that, take my word for it.  But getting anyone to take my word for anything is a crazy daydream of my own.   Ah well.    

Oh, neearly forgot, he shows that there are plans in the works to justify and reinstate SLAVERY as a fine institution, especially since Mohammed practiced it.  Oh and rape too.  Such wonderful Progressove policies are developing in our world.  Like rolling back the gains made on behalf of women by trating biological men who want to be women as really women so they can compete in women's sports.  If you are intimidated into tolerating such idiocies please wake up.

I'm going to try to stop talking about politics now

 So we've exchanged a man who can be rude and crude and personally obnoxious at times but extremely effective as a policy maker for the good of the country, for a figurehead who will be overcome by the hard Left and usher in a totalitarian government that silences and eliminates all those it dislikes while destroying the economy, marginalizing and putting its own citizens in danger, and making America into a third world slum. Great.  

Thursday, February 4, 2021

HOW THEY GOT TRUMP SO ABSOLUTELY WRONG. Good Analyses of the Anti-Racist Craziness Marred by Trump Derangement Syndrome

I really like a lot of these black "public intellectuals" I recently discovered through Bret Weinstein's "Roundtable" discussion.  Bret Weinstein's DarkHorse Podcast - Black Intellectual Roundtable - YouTube      They are true thinkers and do a good job of analyzing the "Anti-Racist" insanities.   But when it comes to Trump, with few exceptions they are irrational Trump Haters.  I watched a discussion between Glenn Loury and Coleman Hughes about race that was really good and illuminating.  Coleman Hughes on The Problem of Race with Glenn Loury [Bonus Episode] - YouTube

Then I watched a discussion between Loury and John McWhorter in which Loury did a great job of defending Trump's policies and then caved on a point of Trump's character.  Then I watched a discussion between Coleman Hughes and Andrew Sullivan in which they tear Trump apart.  

Why did you cave, Glenn Loury?  Trump's threat to democracy | Glenn Loury & John McWhorter | The Glenn Show - YouTube   Glenn Loury has generally done a fine job of defending the policies of Donald Trump and countering the attacks on Trump as a personality as mostly irrelevant in the context of his policies.  Now he capitulates with a "mea culpa" because he thinks Trump shouldn't have been contesting the election outcome as he did, that "a bigger man" would simply have stepped down.  Because of this, and apparently only this, he now agrees with some of his opponents that character has been a bigger factor in the Trump presidency than he's admitted.   He mentions a book by a NeverTrumper that apparently contributed to his change of view, that persuaded him of the great importance of character in the Presidency.  

Which of coursre makes me gag.  Who are you putting above Trump in that category?  Biden?  Gag.  Hillary?  Gaggity gag.  Obama, yeah gag even to the superficially clean Obama.  Bill Clinton?  Gabbity gaggity gag gag gag.  What on EARTH can it mean to criticize Trump when this is the company he must be judged by?  You've lost your compass, Loury.

But his character is now the big issue because of his challenging the election results?  Golly Gosh, didn't Gore challenge and ghallenge and challenge the election results against Bush?  But that wasn't a character flaw.  In that context we aren't talking about how a "bigger man" would have stepped down?  What?

And of course supposedly Trump didn't have enough evidence to make his claim.  (Gore did?  "Hanging chads?")  But in fact there was so much "irregularity" that points to election fraud in many big blue cities it's a mere technicality to say he has no "evidence."  Hundreds of witnesses signed affidavits testifying to many different kinds of fraud they personally witnessed, some of it pretty small and local such as running the same ballot through the tallying machine many times, but some of it pretty big, such as truckloads of ballots showing up to be counted in the dead of night.  And dozens of other "irreguarities" besides.  Starting with the last-minute changes to the rules for voting that opened up the possibility of vast fraud.  AND the fact that the voting machines were capable of being programmed to switch votes from one candidate to another.  LOTS and LOTS of reason to take Trump's claim seriously.

I also want to object again to the characterization of Trump as out only for his own interests.  .Which in the case of a self-made billionaire is about as wacko as it gets.  People who have known him for years have said he'd often talked of running for President BECAUSE HE CARED ABOUT THE COUNTRY.   This same theme came across in the Republican Convention last summer too.   This idea that he would fight the election results for some egocentric reason so misjudges the man it makes me cry.  He's no paragon but one thing I know, as do his supporters in general, he was working for the good of the nation AND NOT FOR HIMSELF, and he did an enormous lot of good during his few years even in the teeth of constant obstruction and endless fraudulent attempts to bring him down.   Losing the election wasn't just his loss it was the nation's loss and boy do we feel that loss acutely as we watch the Democrat rolling back all the good that Trump did.   Maybe we can't prove it yet but I'm convinced that eventually it will be proved that the election was rigged and that Biden is in fact the bogus President they kept falsely saying Trump was.

Then I heard some of Coleman Hughes talking with Andrew Sullivan about Trump, in which they dissect his personality so viciously it's like a punch in the stomach.  I guess I'[ll never get it,  I'll never be able to coimprehend how they are reading him.    .The End of Trump with Andrew Sullivan (Ep.18) - YouTube

McWhorter found it hard to believe that Loury didn't see Trump as the venal narcissist he hallucinates in him.   His detractors see him as a threat to democracy, a threat to the Constitution.  This is astonishing.  His supporters see him as the complete opposite, the savior of the Republic (not really a democracy) and the Constitution, against the Left which is the real agent of destruction of everything American.  Making America Great Again means at least strengthening and preserving America's foundations.  How is it McWhorter and Hughes and Sullivan can see him as the opposite?  How?  Hughes said at first he thought Trump really could be a Hitler.  Then he realized he was not a Hitler, he was a "different kind of "a-hole."  What are they seeing?    Sulliivan gives a clue when he says he realized that Trump isn't the kind of authoritarian who seeks to control others since he was mostly objecting to interferences with his work.  To Sullivan he was attacking the Constitution by asserting his right to be left alone to do his job as if that meant he was bent on doing whatever he pleased with no concern whatever for the Constitutional restraints on him.  This is mindboggling to someone who knows he was objecting to the incessant UNCONSTITUTIONAL obsturctions and intereferences with his CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFINED ROLE AS PRESIDENT.  He was objecting to that interference and gets seen as the one doing the obstruction and the interfer\ing.   What a diaboligical situation he was in.  And his opponents just go right on with their blind misreading of everything that was happening and their own antiConstitutional assaults oln the man who was just tryinjg to do the job he was elected to do.  So Sullivan has generously exonerated Trump of being a fascist/authoritarian, now interpreting him as merely an unethical narcissistic personality. At least he has the grace to wonder if he got it right.  But in rushes Hughes to assure him that he did, that Trump is just so selfish he can't even have an evil vision  for the country.  

I've got to emphasize this because I'm realizing it's at the core of the political divide concerning Trump.   Hughes says Trump is so selfish he can't even have an evil vision for the country because all his visions are for himself.  This is the essence, the core of how theyh misread Trump.  I may never get what it is in their heads that leads them there but it's become clear to me that they go wrong somewhere in here.   This is staggering.  Absolutely staggering.   But it how the Left tends to see him.  And the got it exactly precisely backwards.  It was ALL for the country, all of it.  NOT FOR HIMSELF.  When he kept emphasizing his accomplishemtns IT WAS BECAUSE THEY KEPT DENIGRATING THEM OR IGNORING THEM, IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIMSLEF, IT WAS ALL ABOUT WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO DO FOR THE COUNTRY.  ALL Of IT.  They hallucinate narcissism in the very things he was doing FOR THE  NATIONJ.   How do they so completely misread him?  There is something wrong  with the minds of these people.  I don't get it, I can't get it, I'll never get it.  They invented the Trump they hate, it's not the real Trump.   They have a whole different set of signs and switches on the tracks in their heads than I do and than 75 million Trump supporters do.  

Tyrant

Dictator

Way of speaking

Flagrant Selfishness

Public pronouncmenets (such as being victorious in the election.)

That's Hughes' list of Trump traits, all of which are sheer insanity from my point of view.  Again, Trump was the ANTIDOTE to tyranny, the dictatorship we saw in Obama and the Democrats in general, now the Biden administration.  The "selfishness" was nothing but his insistence on emphasizing his accomplishments in fulfilling his campaign promises.  It truly looked like he'd won the election on election night and a lot of us still think he did and that it was lost overnight becausae of fraud.  But the point is that he says these things FOR HIS SUPPORTERS because the media hat4e him and hate his supporters and he saw his job as keeping the truth alive that was being buried by the Left.   It's a crazy blindness that doesn't see this. .    

Sullivan would say similarly hateful things while yet acknowledging that some of Trump's policies are good ones he agrees with.  He objects to the racial obsession of the Left, he wants protected borders, he liked what Trump did with the economy.   All the things that Trump's voters like he also likes.  Except for his weird assessment of Trump's personality.  Four more years of Trump could have saved the nation.  Now it's all going to be destroyed.  Again.  People losing jobs, environmental measures that actually do nothing to help the environment, in fact increase the carbon footprint rather than decreasing it, and losing all the jobs Trump created, and so on and so forth.  Down to oblivion we go.  Because some people hallucinate Hilter in a true American patriot while letting the real Hitlers acquire the power to destroy the whole country.   

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

Trump Derangement Syndrome Continues

 This endless witch hunt against Donald Trump is insane.  Trump said absolutely nothing in his speech to incite the rioting at the Capitol building.  NOTHING.  He mentioned ONCE that he knew they planned to go over there to PEACFULLY protest and MAKE THEIR VOICES HEARD.  That's ALL he said.  And besides, the rioting was already qwell underway while he was speaking, and they now know that it was planned well in advance of the rally, so this whole BLAME TRUMP theme is just the usual politically motivated anti-American attack on75 million American citizens.  It is the people who are promoting this lie and this witch hunt who should be reprimanded, not Trump and his supporters. 

Tuesday, February 2, 2021

The Lies and Fascist Strongarm Tactics of the "Anti-Racist" Protests in America

UPDATE Feb 10  This video of the Evergreen College incident showed up at You Tube today:  \Campus Argument Goes Viral As Evergreen State Is Caught In Racial Turmoil (HBO) - YouTube
The scary thing is how people buy into an ideological dogma and completely leave all reason behind.  If you're white you have to see yourself as having White Privilege, or just being a racist no matter what you've ever thought or believed.  There's a "narrative" that must be followed no matter what the reality.  Bret Weinstein who was clearly no racist is now branded a racist and called a "piece of sh--" by these protestors altnough he's never been a racist.  A student of his is afraid to defend him because her point of view is forbidden.  All this is pure Marxism, totalitarianism.  They even actively denounce freedom of speech when it contradicts their ideology.   This is the kind of nonthinking craziness that now prevails in too much of the public mind on the subject of race.  It decrees "systemic racism" that no longer exists, it brands people "white supremacists" who are no such thing, and so on.

UPDATE Feb 3:  Reviewing some of the links in this post and they make me truly sick that anyone can get away with this stuff.  Fascism in the name of Anti-Fascism, Bigotry in the name of Anti-Bigotry, Racism in the name of Anti-Racism, this stuff is sick sick sick and how on earth did we let it get this far?
=======================================================

I've touched on some aspects of this situation from time to time, but in this post I want to try to be comprehensive.  Among the evils being perpetrated on the nation by the Left this is one of the biggest and most dangerous, and what makes it particuilarly dangerous is the refusal by the Left to recognize and deal with the lies and the violence they promote.   Among the lies are the fact that not only is BLM founded on false accounts of police incidents but it is not really about black lives at all but more about LGBT issues and is a self-identified Marxist group which is clear from their website.  I'm not specifially addreswsing Antifa in this post but they represent the warning given by Huey Long (about whom I know next to nothign besides this quote) that "If fascism comes to America it will come in the name of Anti-Fascism."   Long's phrase gets at it most precisely but Reagan said it would come in the form of Liberalism, which is another way of saying the same thing less pithily.  And here we are, and it is being aggressively promoted on the left and tacitly promoted through cowardice on the right.
=======================================================.  

Some months ago I discovered You Tube videos about an incident in 2017 in which a biology professor at Evergreen State College in the state of Washington was accused of racism and forced to leave the school. This was for refusing to honor an order by a radical campus group to stay away from campus for a day because he was white.  He objected, he said, as a liberal, to the racist meaning of such an order.  The group protested and eventually got him ousted from his position, so that he and his wife, also a biology professor at the school, left the college and moved to another state.  \

This is how I got to know about Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying, whose weekly "Dark Horse Podcast" I often watch.    They are liberals, but not crazy liberals as I usually think of liberals, and it was by watching their podcast and Bret's interviews with others that I got to know of what I think of as the sane liberals I hadn't known existed.   I hasten to add, however, that although they are sane on some issues and up to a point, there is always that point where they go off into the crazy stuff.  In my opinion.  Nevertheless I've much appreciated their commentary on such events as the protests and riots in the city of Portland Oregon where they now live.   They are in a particularly good position to discuss those events because of their experience at Evergreen, which even at the time Weinstein recognized as a portent of just such events in the nation at large.

First here are some videos to give the Evergreen story itself.  There are many more at You Tube for anyone who wants to get into the details..
\
This one is a fairly brief description of what happened there by Bret and Heather:   

A year later Bret testified to Congress on the Evergreen events:

Here's a lengthy account of the events and politics of the Evergreen story:
PART ONE: Bret Weinstein, Heather Heying & the Evergreen Equity Council - YouTube    The "equity" statements read about five minutes in literally turn my stomach.  This is the lying foundation of the rewriting of American history and the violence it promotes.  The self-righteous sanctimonious framework for these lies is the most nauseating part of it.   (The same nauseating sanctinomy attended the impeachment of Trump by the way.   Such influential lies are horrific in themselves but the high-toned rhetoric makes them disgusting.)  You hear assertion after assertion after assertion that this supposed racism exists at Evergreen with not one shred of evidence that it does, which Weinstein and Heying do point out.   When we do have evidence concerning incidents considered to be racism, such as in the case of George Floyd, which I deal with below, the evidence shows the opposite:  there is NO systemic racism any more in America.   Oh racism there no doubt is in some individuals, but even that is rare, but racism that actually affects the lives of people NO.  For all this rhetoric to be coming up after the nation has so effectively done away with systemic racism is some kind of pernicious evil that can only exist because the objectives are something other than what they claim, such as a Marxist design on overthrowing the country.

Here's Part Two of this presentation:    

 And here's Part Three:  

I remember this kind of thetoric from the sixties and it was scary enough then.  Lies are scary.  Self=righteous violence-promoting lies are scariest.  Racism wasn't the only issue then, it was aimed against America in general and it was clearly a Marxist movement.  It's the essence of authoritarianism, totalitarianism, groupthink, enslaved minds, and sheer insanity, and whatever truth there ever was in any of it the rhetoric took it way beyond any such reality, and now we have nothing but this gigantic fantasy people have bought into, by which they intend to subdue and enslave the whole nation.  

=====================================================

As Weinstein predicted, theEvergreen protests spread to the rest of the country, already und3erway with the BLM protests such as at Ferguson Missouri, but then it all broke out over the death of George Floyd by arresting police.  In Portland, Oregon, now, Bret does podcasts with his wife Heather Heying on the rioting in downtown Portland, and does many interviews on the general subject of systemic racism and what the George Floyd incident really means.  Despite the constant drumbeat in the mainstream media that supports the BLM view of systemic racism as the cause of police brutality toward blacks, when the facts emerge it turns out that racism is not involved at all.  But you aren't going to find that out if you stick to the usual sources of information.

Bret Weinstein interviews seven black "public intellectuals" on the current racial situation:

Bret Weinstein interviews John McWhorter, one of those in the panel above, and brings out some of the facts that contradict the racism narrative.

Coleman Hughes, one of the members of the panel interviewed above, in a long monologue shows with documentary evidence that racism is not the reason for the George Floyde incident or any of the incidents BLM is based on, but that whites are treated in exactly the same way blacks are.

I believe all the above consider themselves to be liberals.  But I want also to include a conservative  -- or libertarian -- black on the subject.  Here is Larry Elder, conservative black talk show host on how the lies about police racism are getting people killed.

Some other black voices to hear on this subject are Candace Owens, Thomas Sowell, and the late Walter Williams.    Because the black voices may be more convincing on this subject, but there are certainly plenty of white voices too.

Monday, February 1, 2021

Lies are Dangerous Weapons 2

Amazing what the leftists have been saying lately about their intentions of silencing conservatives on the excuse of the Capitol breakin.  They are the fascists, they are the insurrectionists, but it serves them to lay those titles on the 75 million of us who voted for Trump.   It's been clear for some time that they long ago abandoned any real adherence to the principles of the Constitution, they  want all the power in their own hands.  So much for "unity" -- their idea of unity is conforming to their political views, period.

It's amazing, as I said, what they are willing to say.  They want to throw conservatives out of office simply for supporting Trump, or for being conservatives.   Of course we are being silenced on social media.  The aim is complete marginalization.   Some are losing jobs already, losing insurance.  Yes, this in America.  I say America is dead, say it from time to time, but it still surprises and shocks me to see how real it is.     

All they have to do is believe their own lies about the right, call us white supremacists and fascists and so on, to justify whatever it takes to silence us.   Someone I know posted the quote by Sinclair Lewis on Facebook recently, how "if fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."   My answer is that if it comes to America it will come in the form of anti-fascism, and that is what is REALLY happening, but the smear tactic against the Right gives them the self-justification  for whatever measures they want to impose against us, all in the name of righteousness, utterlyh blinded to the truth.  

What they consider to be righteousness is the opposite.  As John MacArthjur recently preached, they are making laws to criminalize true righteousness.  They are the fascists but they are calling their opponents the fascists.  Lies are dangerous weapons, very effective.

Persecution is underway, it's not a matter of whether it will come or not, it's underway, they ARE silencing us and marginalizing us.  It's only going to get worse.   More pastors are starding to preach on it to prepare their congregations for it.    The latest "Understanding the Times" radio show addresses this:   The Approaching Darkness – Pastor Tom Hughes and Pastor Mark Henry - YouTube

Evolutionistical Delusion 2

 Yes of course the Earth goes around the sun;  yes of course HIV causes AIDS, yes of course tectonic movement of the continents is real.   BUT EVOLUTION FROM ONE SPECIES TO ANOTHER  IS NOT.  And why don't they know the difference?  They actually put all these things in the same category as if just as the first three are settled science, so is the Darwinian explanation of the existence and diversity of all living things.   They may have lots more IQ points than I have (maybe) but they can't see through this simple logical error.